These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35295238)

  • 1. Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates.
    Keswani RN; Wood M; Benson M; Gawron AJ; Kahi C; Kaltenbach T; Yadlapati R; Gregory D; Duloy A
    Endosc Int Open; 2022 Mar; 10(3):E232-E237. PubMed ID: 35295238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Video-Based Assessments of Colonoscopy Inspection Quality Correlate With Quality Metrics and Highlight Areas for Improvement.
    Duloy A; Yadlapati RH; Benson M; Gawron AJ; Kahi CJ; Kaltenbach TR; McClure J; Gregory DL; Keswani RN
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Mar; 17(4):691-700. PubMed ID: 29908363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Withdrawal time of 8 minutes is associated with higher adenoma detection rates in surveillance colonoscopy after surgery for colorectal cancer.
    Jung DH; Lee JI; Huh CW; Kim MJ; Youn YH; Choi YH; Kim BW
    Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2354-2361. PubMed ID: 32440929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colonoscopy-Naïve Raters Can Be Trained to Assess Colonoscopy Quality.
    Keswani RN; Benson M; Beveridge C; Gawron AJ; Gluskin AB; Kahi CJ; Kaltenbach TR; McClure J; Schenck R; Yadlapati RH; Duloy A
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Apr; 18(4):989-991.e1. PubMed ID: 31228569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implications of stable or increasing adenoma detection rate on the need for continuous measurement.
    El Rahyel A; Vemulapalli KC; Lahr RE; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 May; 95(5):948-953.e4. PubMed ID: 34687741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of computer aided detection device on the adenoma detection rate and serrated detection rate among trainee fellows.
    Khouri A; Dickson C; Green A; Hanjar A; Sonnier W
    JGH Open; 2024 Sep; 8(9):e70018. PubMed ID: 39253018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
    Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adenoma detection rate metrics in colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy.
    Tjaden JM; Hause JA; Berger D; Duveneck SK; Jakate SM; Orkin BA; Hubbard EL; Melson JE
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3108-3113. PubMed ID: 29340817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Serrated polyp detection rate and advanced adenoma detection rate from a US multicenter cohort.
    Klair JS; Ashat M; Johnson D; Arora S; Onteddu N; Machain Palacio JG; Samuel R; Bilal M; Buddam A; Gupta A; Gunderson A; Guturu P; Soota K; Chandra S; Murali AR
    Endoscopy; 2020 Jan; 52(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 31739370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
    Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies.
    Wieszczy P; Waldmann E; Løberg M; Regula J; Rupinski M; Bugajski M; Gray K; Kalager M; Ferlitsch M; Kaminski MF; Bretthauer M
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Mar; 160(4):1067-1074.e6. PubMed ID: 33065063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
    Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T
    Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multicenter pragmatic study of an evidence-based intervention to improve adenoma detection: the Quality Improvement in Colonoscopy (QIC) study.
    Rajasekhar PT; Rees CJ; Bramble MG; Wilson DW; Rutter MD; Saunders BP; Hungin AP; East JE
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 25675176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Correlation between adenoma detection rate and advanced adenoma detection rate].
    Lee SY; Kim NH; Chae HB; Han KJ; Lee TH; Jang CM; Yoo KM; Jung YS; Park JH; Kim HJ; Cho YK; Sohn CI; Jeon WK; Kim BI; Park DI
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 64(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 25073667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in a gastroenterology practice.
    le Clercq CM; Mooi RJ; Winkens B; Salden BN; Bakker CM; van Nunen AB; Keulen EP; de Ridder RJ; Masclee AA; Sanduleanu S
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 26808394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of 9-Minute Withdrawal Time on the Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Zhao S; Yang X; Wang S; Meng Q; Wang R; Bo L; Chang X; Pan P; Xia T; Yang F; Yao J; Zheng J; Sheng J; Zhao X; Tang S; Wang Y; Wang Y; Gong A; Chen W; Shen J; Zhu X; Wang S; Yan C; Yang Y; Zhu Y; Ma RJ; Wang R; Ma Y; Li Z; Bai Y
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Feb; 20(2):e168-e181. PubMed ID: 33220526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.