These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3529607)
1. A comparison of the STAPH-Ident and STAPH-Trac systems to conventional methods in the identification of staphylococci isolated from bovine udders. Watts JL; Nickerson SC Vet Microbiol; 1986 Jul; 12(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 3529607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of Staphylococcus species of bovine origin with the DMS Staph-Trac system. Langlois BE; Harmon RJ; Akers K J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 20(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 6386845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Staph-Ident and STAPHase systems for identification of staphylococci from bovine intramammary infections. Watts JL; Pankey JW; Nickerson SC J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):448-52. PubMed ID: 6386862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the API Staph-Ident and DMS Staph-Trac systems with conventional methods used for the identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Giger O; Charilaou CC; Cundy KR J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jan; 19(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 6361063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the MicroScan system with the API Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Hussain Z; Stoakes L; Stevens DL; Schieven BC; Lannigan R; Jones C J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):126-8. PubMed ID: 3517037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of staphylococci from bovine udders: evaluation of the API 20GP system. Watts JL; Owens WE; Nickerson SC Can J Microbiol; 1986 Apr; 32(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 3521817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the API Staph-Ident and DMS Staph Trac micromethods for the identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Giovannetti DI; Barnum DA Can J Vet Res; 1986 Jan; 50(1):120-2. PubMed ID: 3527388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of modified Minitek system with Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Crouch SF; Pearson TA; Parham DM J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 25(9):1626-8. PubMed ID: 3654937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of current methods for isolation and identification of staphylococci in raw bovine milk. Harvey J; Gilmour A J Appl Bacteriol; 1985 Sep; 59(3):207-21. PubMed ID: 3902759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a conventional routine method for identification of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species. Comparison with API-Staph and API-Staph-Ident. Gahrn-Hansen B; Heltberg O; Rosdahl VT; Søgaard P Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1987 Oct; 95(5):283-92. PubMed ID: 3314337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API STAPH-IDENT system. Almeida RJ; Jorgensen JH J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Aug; 18(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 6352730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison of the AutoMicrobic system gram-positive identification card, API Staph-Ident, and conventional methods in the identification of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. Grasmick AE; Naito N; Bruckner DA J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Dec; 18(6):1323-8. PubMed ID: 6361051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Staph-Zym system with staphylococci isolated from bovine intramammary infections. Watts JL; Washburn PJ J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Jan; 29(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 1993769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of API Staph ID 32 and Staph-Zym for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine milk samples. Sampimon OC; Zadoks RN; De Vliegher S; Supré K; Haesebrouck F; Barkema HW; Sol J; Lam TJ Vet Microbiol; 2009 May; 136(3-4):300-5. PubMed ID: 19110383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Species identification and biotyping of staphylococci by the API staph-ident system. Doern GV; Earls JE; Jeznach PA; Parker DS J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Feb; 17(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 6339546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of various methods for differentiation of staphylococci and micrococci. Baker JS J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):875-9. PubMed ID: 6381527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of five commercial systems for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci to species level. Skulnick M; Patel MP; Low DE Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Nov; 8(11):1001-3. PubMed ID: 2513191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of the API Staph-Ident system for identification of Staphylococcus species from milk. Jasper DE; Infante F; Dellinger JD Am J Vet Res; 1985 Jun; 46(6):1263-7. PubMed ID: 3896065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of Staphylococcus species of bovine origin with the API Staph-Ident system. Langlois BE; Harmon RJ; Akers K J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Nov; 18(5):1212-9. PubMed ID: 6643670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Staph-Ident system with a conventional method for species identification of urine and blood isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Aldridge KE; Stratton CW; Patterson LS; Evans ME; Hodges RL J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Mar; 17(3):516-20. PubMed ID: 6841586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]