These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35296357)

  • 1. Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.
    Lewis S; Ganti A; Argiriadi P; Rosen A; Hectors S; Semaan S; Song C; Peti S; Segall M; George K; Jaikaran V; Villa S; Kestenbaum D; Voutsinas N; Doucette J; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
    Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35296357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.
    Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil.
    O'Donohoe RL; Dunne RM; Kimbrell V; Tempany CM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):1062-1069. PubMed ID: 30324501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DWI of the prostate: Comparison of a faster diagonal acquisition to standard three-scan trace acquisition.
    Corcuera-Solano I; Wagner M; Hectors S; Lewis S; Titelbaum N; Stemmer A; Rastinehad A; Tewari A; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1767-1775. PubMed ID: 28301097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-centre comparative experimental study of biparametric MRI at 3.0 T with and without endorectal coil using kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) as a phantom for human prostate.
    Murer S; Scheidler J; Mueller-Lisse UL; Helling M; Scherr M; Mueller-Lisse UG
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2019 Aug; 3(1):30. PubMed ID: 31410699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Novel Three-Channel Endorectal Coil for Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3T.
    Mo Z; Zhang X; Liang H; Chen Q; Tie C; Xiao W; Cao Q; Liu C; Zou C; Wan L; Zhang X; Li Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Dec; 70(12):3381-3388. PubMed ID: 37318962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality Comparison of 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI of the prostate using a flexible surface receiver coil versus conventional surface coil plus endorectal coil setup.
    Ullrich T; Kohli MD; Ohliger MA; Magudia K; Arora SS; Barrett T; Bittencourt LK; Margolis DJ; Schimmöller L; Turkbey B; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4260-4270. PubMed ID: 32696213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of prostate cancer detection at 3-T MRI with and without an endorectal coil: A prospective, paired-patient study.
    Costa DN; Yuan Q; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Lenkinski RE; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Francis F; Travalini D; Pedrosa I
    Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):255.e7-255.e13. PubMed ID: 26971190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Head-to-head comparison of prostate MRI using an endorectal coil versus a non-endorectal coil: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance in staging T3 prostate cancer.
    Tirumani SH; Suh CH; Kim KW; Shinagare AB; Ramaiya NH; Fennessy FM
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e9-157.e19. PubMed ID: 31711637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image quality.
    Ullrich T; Quentin M; Oelers C; Dietzel F; Sawicki LM; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Blondin D; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():192-197. PubMed ID: 28583633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volume and landmark analysis: comparison of MRI measurements obtained with an endorectal coil and with a phased-array coil.
    Mazaheri Y; Afaq AA; Jung SI; Goldman DA; Wang L; Aslan H; Zelefsky MJ; Akin O; Hricak H
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Apr; 70(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 25554540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2: A multireader study.
    Smith CP; Harmon SA; Barrett T; Bittencourt LK; Law YM; Shebel H; An JY; Czarniecki M; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(6):1694-1703. PubMed ID: 30575184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep Learning Reconstruction Enables Highly Accelerated Biparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate.
    Johnson PM; Tong A; Donthireddy A; Melamud K; Petrocelli R; Smereka P; Qian K; Keerthivasan MB; Chandarana H; Knoll F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):184-195. PubMed ID: 34877735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.
    Lee SH; Park KK; Choi KH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Lee SW; Chung BH
    World J Urol; 2010 Dec; 28(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20623288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical comparison between a currently available single-loop and an investigational dual-channel endorectal receive coil for prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Vos EK; Sambandamurthy S; Kamel M; McKenney R; van Uden MJ; Hoeks CM; Yakar D; Scheenen TW; Fütterer JJ
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 24019020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI of the Prostate With and Without Endorectal Coil at 3 T: Correlation With Whole-Mount Histopathologic Gleason Score.
    Dhatt R; Choy S; Co SJ; Ischia J; Kozlowski P; Harris AC; Jones EC; Black PC; Goldenberg SL; Chang SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 32160050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate MRI: Is Endorectal Coil Necessary?-A Review.
    Lee G; Oto A; Giurcanu M
    Life (Basel); 2022 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35455060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results.
    Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):842-7. PubMed ID: 18007156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multitransmit external body array combined with a
    Philips BWJ; van Uden MJ; Rietsch SHG; Orzada S; Scheenen TWJ
    Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3893-3905. PubMed ID: 31274201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.