190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35296357)
1. Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.
Lewis S; Ganti A; Argiriadi P; Rosen A; Hectors S; Semaan S; Song C; Peti S; Segall M; George K; Jaikaran V; Villa S; Kestenbaum D; Voutsinas N; Doucette J; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35296357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.
Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil.
O'Donohoe RL; Dunne RM; Kimbrell V; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):1062-1069. PubMed ID: 30324501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DWI of the prostate: Comparison of a faster diagonal acquisition to standard three-scan trace acquisition.
Corcuera-Solano I; Wagner M; Hectors S; Lewis S; Titelbaum N; Stemmer A; Rastinehad A; Tewari A; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1767-1775. PubMed ID: 28301097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-centre comparative experimental study of biparametric MRI at 3.0 T with and without endorectal coil using kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) as a phantom for human prostate.
Murer S; Scheidler J; Mueller-Lisse UL; Helling M; Scherr M; Mueller-Lisse UG
Eur Radiol Exp; 2019 Aug; 3(1):30. PubMed ID: 31410699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Novel Three-Channel Endorectal Coil for Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3T.
Mo Z; Zhang X; Liang H; Chen Q; Tie C; Xiao W; Cao Q; Liu C; Zou C; Wan L; Zhang X; Li Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Dec; 70(12):3381-3388. PubMed ID: 37318962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality Comparison of 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI of the prostate using a flexible surface receiver coil versus conventional surface coil plus endorectal coil setup.
Ullrich T; Kohli MD; Ohliger MA; Magudia K; Arora SS; Barrett T; Bittencourt LK; Margolis DJ; Schimmöller L; Turkbey B; Westphalen AC
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4260-4270. PubMed ID: 32696213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of prostate cancer detection at 3-T MRI with and without an endorectal coil: A prospective, paired-patient study.
Costa DN; Yuan Q; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Lenkinski RE; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Francis F; Travalini D; Pedrosa I
Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):255.e7-255.e13. PubMed ID: 26971190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Head-to-head comparison of prostate MRI using an endorectal coil versus a non-endorectal coil: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance in staging T3 prostate cancer.
Tirumani SH; Suh CH; Kim KW; Shinagare AB; Ramaiya NH; Fennessy FM
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e9-157.e19. PubMed ID: 31711637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image quality.
Ullrich T; Quentin M; Oelers C; Dietzel F; Sawicki LM; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Blondin D; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():192-197. PubMed ID: 28583633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volume and landmark analysis: comparison of MRI measurements obtained with an endorectal coil and with a phased-array coil.
Mazaheri Y; Afaq AA; Jung SI; Goldman DA; Wang L; Aslan H; Zelefsky MJ; Akin O; Hricak H
Clin Radiol; 2015 Apr; 70(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 25554540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2: A multireader study.
Smith CP; Harmon SA; Barrett T; Bittencourt LK; Law YM; Shebel H; An JY; Czarniecki M; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(6):1694-1703. PubMed ID: 30575184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep Learning Reconstruction Enables Highly Accelerated Biparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate.
Johnson PM; Tong A; Donthireddy A; Melamud K; Petrocelli R; Smereka P; Qian K; Keerthivasan MB; Chandarana H; Knoll F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):184-195. PubMed ID: 34877735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.
Lee SH; Park KK; Choi KH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Lee SW; Chung BH
World J Urol; 2010 Dec; 28(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20623288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison between a currently available single-loop and an investigational dual-channel endorectal receive coil for prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 and 3 T.
Vos EK; Sambandamurthy S; Kamel M; McKenney R; van Uden MJ; Hoeks CM; Yakar D; Scheenen TW; Fütterer JJ
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 24019020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI of the Prostate With and Without Endorectal Coil at 3 T: Correlation With Whole-Mount Histopathologic Gleason Score.
Dhatt R; Choy S; Co SJ; Ischia J; Kozlowski P; Harris AC; Jones EC; Black PC; Goldenberg SL; Chang SD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 32160050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate MRI: Is Endorectal Coil Necessary?-A Review.
Lee G; Oto A; Giurcanu M
Life (Basel); 2022 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35455060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results.
Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):842-7. PubMed ID: 18007156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multitransmit external body array combined with a
Philips BWJ; van Uden MJ; Rietsch SHG; Orzada S; Scheenen TWJ
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3893-3905. PubMed ID: 31274201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
