178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35296398)
1. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Fatone S; Stine R; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Gard SA; Oros M; Major MJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 35296398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets on Comfort, Function, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Device in Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Fatone S; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Stine R; Kim KY; Gard S; Oros M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Nov; 102(11):2063-2073.e2. PubMed ID: 34214499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of NU-FlexSIV Socket Performance for Military Service Members with Transfemoral Amputation.
Brown SE; Russell Esposito E; Ikeda AJ; Wilken JM; Fatone S
US Army Med Dep J; 2018; (2-18):38-47. PubMed ID: 30623397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation.
Fatone S; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coronal plane socket stability during gait in persons with transfemoral amputation: Pilot study.
Fatone S; Dillon M; Stine R; Tillges R
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(8):1217-28. PubMed ID: 25629691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technique modifications for a suction suspension version of the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum socket: The Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Suction socket.
Caldwell R; Fatone S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Apr; 43(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 30223715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique.
Fatone S; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28094686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of different types of sockets on the range of motion of the hip joint by the transfemoral amputee.
Klotz R; Colobert B; Botino M; Permentiers I
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 54(7):399-410. PubMed ID: 21996548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Hybrid Subischial Socket for Persons With Transfemoral Amputation: Gait Parameters and Clinical Assessment of a Case Series.
Pellegrini R; Denza G; Brunelli S; Zenardi D; Imperio M; Vannozzi G; Traballesi M
Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2021; 4(1):36252. PubMed ID: 37614930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket.
Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial.
Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative analysis of interface pressures in transfemoral prosthetic sockets.
Paternò L; Truppa L; Ibrahimi M; Rosini E; Gruppioni E; Ricotti L; Menciassi A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Apr; 48(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 37379468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of ischial ramal angle for transfemoral ischial containment sockets.
Quigley M; Dillon MP; Fernandez RG; Erbas B; Briggs C
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30044195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current transfemoral sockets.
Schuch CM; Pritham CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):48-54. PubMed ID: 10212595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of transfemoral socket adduction on pelvic and trunk stabilization during level walking - A biomechanical study.
Köhler TM; Blumentritt S; Braatz F; Bellmann M
Gait Posture; 2021 Sep; 89():169-177. PubMed ID: 34311436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Energy cost of walking in transfemoral amputees: Comparison between Marlo Anatomical Socket and Ischial Containment Socket.
Traballesi M; Delussu AS; Averna T; Pellegrini R; Paradisi F; Brunelli S
Gait Posture; 2011 Jun; 34(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 21684165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transfemoral interfaces with vacuum assisted suspension comparison of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: ischial containment versus brimless.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
Gait Posture; 2014 Jun; 40(2):315-20. PubMed ID: 24852508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stump-socket interface pressure as an aid to socket design in prostheses for trans-femoral amputees--a preliminary study.
Lee VS; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9184457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motion of the residual femur within the socket during gait is associated with patient-reported problems in transfemoral amputees.
Gale T; Yang S; McGough R; Fiedler G; Anderst W
J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110050. PubMed ID: 33035840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
