BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35296994)

  • 1. Economic Evaluation of Sintilimab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib as a First-line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhou T; Cao Y; Wang X; Yang L; Wang Z; Ma A; Li H
    Adv Ther; 2022 May; 39(5):2165-2177. PubMed ID: 35296994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Su D; Wu B; Shi L
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study.
    Ren Z; Xu J; Bai Y; Xu A; Cang S; Du C; Li Q; Lu Y; Chen Y; Guo Y; Chen Z; Liu B; Jia W; Wu J; Wang J; Shao G; Zhang B; Shan Y; Meng Z; Wu J; Gu S; Yang W; Liu C; Shi X; Gao Z; Yin T; Cui J; Huang M; Xing B; Mao Y; Teng G; Qin Y; Wang J; Xia F; Yin G; Yang Y; Chen M; Wang Y; Zhou H; Fan J;
    Lancet Oncol; 2021 Jul; 22(7):977-990. PubMed ID: 34143971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Zhou T; Wang X; Cao Y; Yang L; Wang Z; Ma A; Li H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1367. PubMed ID: 36397064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination compared with sorafenib as the first-line systemic treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China and the United states.
    Wen F; Zheng H; Zhang P; Liao W; Zhou K; Li Q
    Liver Int; 2021 May; 41(5):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 33556230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sintilimab Plus Bevacizumab Biosimilar Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Peng Y; Zeng X; Peng L; Liu Q; Yi L; Luo X; Li S; Wang L; Qin S; Wan X; Tan C
    Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():778505. PubMed ID: 35222020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.
    Gong H; Ong SC; Li F; Weng Z; Zhao K; Jiang Z
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Mar; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 37004046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab compared with sorafenib as first-line treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Singapore.
    Chee CE; Khara JS; Cheong J; Fong J; Sivanesan S; Choy JY; Hu M; Viswambaram A; Toh HC
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2024 Jun; 24(5):631-641. PubMed ID: 38776431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus IBI305 versus sorafenib for unresectable hepatic cell carcinoma in China.
    Xu Z; Ye ZM; Tang YK; Deng DF; Zhou Q; Fang M; Zhang YY; Li XP
    Cancer Med; 2023 Jul; 12(14):14871-14880. PubMed ID: 37434398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis.
    Zhao M; Pan X; Yin Y; Hu H; Wei J; Bai Z; Tang W
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():869960. PubMed ID: 35493395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economic evaluation of sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for the treatment of first-line advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC.
    Chen P; Wang X; Zhu S; Li H; Rui M; Wang Y; Sun H; Ma A
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():956792. PubMed ID: 36016894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. First-line systemic treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wang L; Peng Y; Qin S; Wan X; Zeng X; Li S; Liu Q; Tan C
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0279786. PubMed ID: 37053300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Societal Perspective.
    Li F; Chen Y; Xiao D; Jiang S; Yang Y
    Adv Ther; 2024 Apr; 41(4):1436-1449. PubMed ID: 38356107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus an Anti-VEGF Antibody as the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Li L; Yang S; Chen Y; Tian L; He Y; Wu B; Dong D
    Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():891008. PubMed ID: 35721168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Cost Effectiveness of Donafenib Compared With Sorafenib for the First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China.
    Meng R; Cao Y; Zhou T; Hu H; Qiu Y
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():794131. PubMed ID: 35433574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Liu L; Wang L; Chen L; Ding Y; Zhang Q; Shu Y
    Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1092385. PubMed ID: 36756110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China.
    Liu H; Wang Y; He Q
    Health Econ Rev; 2022 Dec; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 36581793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immunotherapy or targeted therapy as the first-line strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Liu K; Zhu Y; Zhu H
    Front Immunol; 2022; 13():1103055. PubMed ID: 36713376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib Versus Sorafenib as a First-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Chinese Health Care System.
    Lang W; Deng L; Huang B; Zhong D; Zhang G; Lu M; Ouyang M
    Clin Drug Investig; 2024 Mar; 44(3):149-162. PubMed ID: 38300386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.