These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35297020)

  • 21. Symbolic versus non-symbolic magnitude estimations among children and adults.
    Ebersbach M; Erz P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Dec; 128():52-68. PubMed ID: 25077407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Symbol Grounding Problem Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the ANS Mapping Account and the Proposal of an Alternative Account Based on Symbol-Symbol Associations.
    Reynvoet B; Sasanguie D
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1581. PubMed ID: 27790179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to estimate how well people estimate: evaluating measures of individual differences in the approximate number system.
    Chesney D; Bjalkebring P; Peters E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2781-802. PubMed ID: 26335207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial-numerical associations: Shared symbolic and non-symbolic numerical representations.
    Buijsman S; Tirado C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2423-2436. PubMed ID: 30931820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A feeling for numbers: shared metric for symbolic and tactile numerosities.
    Krause F; Bekkering H; Lindemann O
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():7. PubMed ID: 23355831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Numerical and nonnumerical estimation in children with and without mathematical learning disabilities.
    Mejias S; Mussolin C; Rousselle L; Grégoire J; Noël MP
    Child Neuropsychol; 2012; 18(6):550-75. PubMed ID: 22117818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving arithmetic performance with number sense training: an investigation of underlying mechanism.
    Park J; Brannon EM
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):188-200. PubMed ID: 25044247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Symbolic Number Comparison Is Not Processed by the Analog Number System: Different Symbolic and Non-symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.
    Krajcsi A; Lengyel G; Kojouharova P
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():124. PubMed ID: 29491845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of math anxiety on symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude processing.
    Dietrich JF; Huber S; Moeller K; Klein E
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1621. PubMed ID: 26579012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Non-symbolic and symbolic number and the approximate number system.
    Gómez DM
    Behav Brain Sci; 2021 Dec; 44():e188. PubMed ID: 34907892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Number-related Brain Potentials Are Differentially Affected by Mapping Novel Symbols on Small versus Large Quantities in a Number Learning Task.
    van den Berg FCG; de Weerd P; Jonkman LM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 32(7):1263-1275. PubMed ID: 32073349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Acuity and Manipulability of the ANS Have Separable Influences on Preschoolers' Symbolic Math Achievement.
    Starr A; Tomlinson RC; Brannon EM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2554. PubMed ID: 30618975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beyond comparison: The influence of physical size on number estimation is modulated by notation, range and spatial arrangement.
    Leibovich T; Al-Rubaiey Kadhim S; Ansari D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Apr; 175():33-41. PubMed ID: 28266312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using Hierarchical Linear Models to Examine Approximate Number System Acuity: The Role of Trial-Level and Participant-Level Characteristics.
    Braham EJ; Elliott L; Libertus ME
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2081. PubMed ID: 30483169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A unitary or multiple representations of numerical magnitude? - the case of structure in symbolic and non-symbolic quantities.
    Moeller K; Klein E; Nuerk HC; Cohen Kadosh R
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():191. PubMed ID: 22712021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improving Preschoolers' Arithmetic through Number Magnitude Training: The Impact of Non-Symbolic and Symbolic Training.
    Honoré N; Noël MP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166685. PubMed ID: 27875540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The mental representation of the magnitude of symbolic and nonsymbolic ratios in adults.
    Meert G; Grégoire J; Seron X; Noël MP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):702-24. PubMed ID: 22217316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Learning correspondences between magnitudes, symbols and words: Evidence for a triple code model of arithmetic development.
    Malone SA; Heron-Delaney M; Burgoyne K; Hulme C
    Cognition; 2019 Jun; 187():1-9. PubMed ID: 30797098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of magnitude processing in children with developmental dyscalculia: space, time, and number.
    Skagerlund K; Träff U
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():675. PubMed ID: 25018746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Priming reveals differential coding of symbolic and non-symbolic quantities.
    Roggeman C; Vergutsa T; Fias W
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):380-94. PubMed ID: 17125760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.