BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35297075)

  • 21. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
    Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating attenuation correction strategies in a dedicated, single-gantry breast PET-tomosynthesis scanner.
    Krishnamoorthy S; Vent T; Barufaldi B; Maidment ADA; Karp JS; Surti S
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235028. PubMed ID: 33113520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. X-ray scatter correction in breast tomosynthesis with a precomputed scatter map library.
    Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS; Seidel RL; Patel B; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031912. PubMed ID: 24593730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A software-based x-ray scatter correction method for breast tomosynthesis.
    Jia Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6643-53. PubMed ID: 22149846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-phase learning-based 3D deblurring method for digital breast tomosynthesis images.
    Choi Y; Han M; Jang H; Shim H; Baek J
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262736. PubMed ID: 35073353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis data using convolutional neural networks and multiple instance learning.
    Yousefi M; Krzyżak A; Suen CY
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():283-293. PubMed ID: 29665537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Garrett JW; Li Y; Li K; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2009-2022. PubMed ID: 29542821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deformable mapping technique to correlate lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
    Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Brock KK; Davis CL; Larson ED; Lau JH; Carson PL
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4402-4417. PubMed ID: 30066340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deep Convolutional Neural Network With Adversarial Training for Denoising Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
    Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2021 Jul; 40(7):1805-1816. PubMed ID: 33729933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition parameters for human observers: effect of reconstruction algorithms.
    Zeng R; Badano A; Myers KJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2598-2611. PubMed ID: 28151728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimate and compensate head motion in non-contrast head CT scans using partial angle reconstruction and deep learning.
    Chen Z; Li Q; Wu D
    Med Phys; 2024 May; 51(5):3309-3321. PubMed ID: 38569143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
    Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A diffusion-based truncated projection artifact reduction method for iterative digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(3):569-87. PubMed ID: 23318346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.