These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35299161)

  • 21. Three-parameter shear wave inversion in MR elastography of incompressible transverse isotropic media: Application to in vivo lower leg muscles.
    Guo J; Hirsch S; Scheel M; Braun J; Sack I
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Apr; 75(4):1537-45. PubMed ID: 25988407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Post-mortem changes of anisotropic mechanical properties in the porcine brain assessed by MR elastography.
    Wang S; Eckstein KN; Guertler CA; Johnson CL; Okamoto RJ; McGarry MDJ; Bayly PV
    Brain Multiphys; 2024 Jun; 6():. PubMed ID: 38933498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative identifiability of anisotropic properties from magnetic resonance elastography.
    Miller R; Kolipaka A; Nash MP; Young AA
    NMR Biomed; 2018 Oct; 31(10):e3848. PubMed ID: 29106765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simultaneous, multidirectional acquisition of displacement fields in magnetic resonance elastography of the in vivo human brain.
    Klatt D; Johnson CL; Magin RL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 25425147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of cerebral cortex viscoelastic property estimation with nonlinear inversion magnetic resonance elastography.
    Hiscox LV; McGarry MDJ; Johnson CL
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Apr; 67(9):. PubMed ID: 35316794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Magnetic Resonance Elastography Reconstruction for Anisotropic Tissues.
    Babaei B; Fovargue D; Lloyd RA; Miller R; Jugé L; Kaplan M; Sinkus R; Nordsletten DA; Bilston LE
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Dec; 74():102212. PubMed ID: 34587584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acquisition and reconstruction conditions in silico for accurate and precise magnetic resonance elastography.
    Yue JL; Tardieu M; Julea F; Boucneau T; Sinkus R; Pellot-Barakat C; Maître X
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(22):8655-8670. PubMed ID: 28980977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of transversely isotropic material properties from magnetic resonance elastography using the optimised virtual fields method.
    Miller R; Kolipaka A; Nash MP; Young AA
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Jun; 34(6):e2979. PubMed ID: 29528568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Phantom evaluations of low frequency MR elastography.
    Solamen LM; Gordon-Wylie SW; McGarry MD; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065010. PubMed ID: 30695755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Concurrent 3D acquisition of diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance elastography displacement data (DTI-MRE): Theory and in vivo application.
    Yin Z; Kearney SP; Magin RL; Klatt D
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jan; 77(1):273-284. PubMed ID: 26787007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain using multishot spiral readouts with self-navigated motion correction.
    Johnson CL; McGarry MD; Van Houten EE; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD; Sutton BP; Georgiadis JG
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Aug; 70(2):404-12. PubMed ID: 23001771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography for elasticity quantitation and optimal tissue discrimination: A two-platform liver fibrosis mimicking phantom study.
    Andoh F; Yue JL; Julea F; Tardieu M; Noûs C; Pagé G; Garteiser P; Van Beers BE; Maitre X; Pellot-Barakat C
    NMR Biomed; 2021 Aug; 34(8):e4543. PubMed ID: 34037285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Brain mechanical property measurement using MRE with intrinsic activation.
    Weaver JB; Pattison AJ; McGarry MD; Perreard IM; Swienckowski JG; Eskey CJ; Lollis SS; Paulsen KD
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7275-87. PubMed ID: 23079508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
    Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanical properties of viscoelastic media by local frequency estimation of divergence-free wave fields.
    Clayton EH; Okamoto RJ; Bayly PV
    J Biomech Eng; 2013 Feb; 135(2):021025. PubMed ID: 23445070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36.
    McGrath DM; Bradley CR; Francis ST
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Nov; 66(22):. PubMed ID: 34678798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. OSCILLATE: A low-rank approach for accelerated magnetic resonance elastography.
    McIlvain G; Cerjanic AM; Christodoulou AG; McGarry MDJ; Johnson CL
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Oct; 88(4):1659-1672. PubMed ID: 35649188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    Smith DR; Caban-Rivera DA; Williams LT; Van Houten EEW; Bayly PV; Paulsen KD; McGarry MDJ; Johnson CL
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(4):. PubMed ID: 36652716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MR elastography inversion by compressive recovery.
    Dong H; Ahmad R; Miller R; Kolipaka A
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Aug; 66(16):. PubMed ID: 34261056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime.
    Okamoto RJ; Clayton EH; Bayly PV
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6379-400. PubMed ID: 21908903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.