These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35301173)

  • 1. Next-generation particulate monitoring.
    Britton R; Davies AV
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Jun; 184():110156. PubMed ID: 35301173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overview of temporary radioxenon background measurement campaigns conducted for the CTBTO between 2008 and 2018.
    Baré J; Gheddou A; Kalinowski MB
    J Environ Radioact; 2023 Feb; 257():107053. PubMed ID: 36375403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radionuclide measurements of the international monitoring system.
    Goodwin MA; Davies AV; Britton R; Miley HS; Eslinger PW; Hoffman I; Ungar K; Mekarski P; Botti A
    J Environ Radioact; 2024 Feb; 272():107357. PubMed ID: 38159463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 2014 Integrated Field Exercise of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty revisited: The case for data fusion.
    Burnett JL; Miley HS; Bowyer TW; Cameron IM
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Sep; 189():175-181. PubMed ID: 29679818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining the potential for detecting simultaneous noble gas and aerosol samples in the international monitoring system radionuclide network.
    Eslinger PW; Burnett JL; Lowrey JD; Milbrath BD; Sarathi R
    J Environ Radioact; 2024 Feb; 272():107349. PubMed ID: 38061191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved performance comparisons of radioxenon systems for low level releases in nuclear explosion monitoring.
    Haas DA; Eslinger PW; Bowyer TW; Cameron IM; Hayes JC; Lowrey JD; Miley HS
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 Nov; 178-179():127-135. PubMed ID: 28818645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Ranjbar L; Farsoni AT; Becker EM
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 Apr; 169-170():221-228. PubMed ID: 28161604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radioxenon spiked air.
    Watrous MG; Delmore JE; Hague RK; Houghton TP; Jenson DD; Mann NR
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Dec; 150():126-31. PubMed ID: 26318775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. International challenge to predict the impact of radioxenon releases from medical isotope production on a comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty sampling station.
    Eslinger PW; Bowyer TW; Achim P; Chai T; Deconninck B; Freeman K; Generoso S; Hayes P; Heidmann V; Hoffman I; Kijima Y; Krysta M; Malo A; Maurer C; Ngan F; Robins P; Ross JO; Saunier O; Schlosser C; Schöppner M; Schrom BT; Seibert P; Stein AF; Ungar K; Yi J
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jun; 157():41-51. PubMed ID: 26998569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of the noble gas system NEX48 in Niger on the radioxenon global network coverage for the International Monitoring System of the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty.
    Abdollahnejad H; Rezaei Ochbelagh D; Azadi M
    J Environ Radioact; 2022 Sep; 250():106913. PubMed ID: 35642847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New evaluated radioxenon decay data and its implications in nuclear explosion monitoring.
    Galan M; Kalinowski M; Gheddou A; Yamba K
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Dec; 192():628-634. PubMed ID: 29525110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty quantification for discrimination of nuclear events as violations of the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty.
    Sloan J; Sun Y; Carrigan C
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 May; 155-156():130-139. PubMed ID: 26994449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of industrial nuclear emissions on nuclear explosion monitoring.
    Miley HS; Eslinger PW
    J Environ Radioact; 2023 Feb; 257():107081. PubMed ID: 36493635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Xenon adsorption on geological media and implications for radionuclide signatures.
    Paul MJ; Biegalski SR; Haas DA; Jiang H; Daigle H; Lowrey JD
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Jul; 187():65-72. PubMed ID: 29449040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A stilbene - CdZnTe based radioxenon detection system.
    Gadey HR; Farsoni AT; Czyz SA; McGee KD
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Aug; 204():117-124. PubMed ID: 31029985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Projected network performance for multiple isotopes using next-generation xenon monitoring systems.
    Eslinger PW; Ely JH; Lowrey JD; Miley HS
    J Environ Radioact; 2022 Oct; 251-252():106963. PubMed ID: 35868224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alternative treaty monitoring approaches using ultra-low background measurement technology.
    Miley HS; Aalseth CE; Bowyer TW; Fast JE; Hayes JC; Hoppe EW; Hossbach TW; Keillor ME; Kephart JD; McIntyre JI; Seifert A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 May; 67(5):746-9. PubMed ID: 19251426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the sensitivity of radionuclide particulate monitoring stations.
    Werzi R
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010 Feb; 68(2):340-4. PubMed ID: 19910200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gamma-spectrometry measurements of filtration media from an Advanced Gas-cooled Reactor.
    Petts A; Burnett J; Goodwin M; Milbrath B
    J Environ Radioact; 2024 May; 275():107414. PubMed ID: 38531199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of radioxenon in Darwin, Australia following the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident.
    Orr B; Schöppner M; Tinker R; Plastino W
    J Environ Radioact; 2013 Dec; 126():40-4. PubMed ID: 23933085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.