These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35301989)

  • 21. The Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Common Oculoplastics Diagnoses and Treatments.
    Cohen SA; Tijerina JD; Kossler A
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 38(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 36524760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials Concerning Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Venosa M; Cerciello S; Zoubi M; Petralia G; Vespasiani A; Angelozzi M; Romanini E; Logroscino G
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58618. PubMed ID: 38770469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Readability and quality assessment of online patient education materials for spinal and epidural anesthesia.
    Rai R; Wiseman JJ; Chau A; Wiseman SM
    Can J Anaesth; 2024 Aug; 71(8):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 38773007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
    Hassan AK; Eleiwa TK; Hassan MA; Sallam AB; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Gise R; Phillips PH; Elhusseiny AM
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
    Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery.
    Chang M; Weiss B; Worrell S; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Sep; 38(9):5259-5265. PubMed ID: 39009725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Content Analysis of Arabic Websites As Patient Resources for Osteoporosis.
    Alabdulmohsen DM; Almahmudi MA; Alnajjad AI; Almarzouq AM
    Cureus; 2024 Jul; 16(7):e64880. PubMed ID: 39156464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
    Aboalshamat K
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.
    Kaya E; Görmez S
    Rheumatol Int; 2022 Nov; 42(11):1965-1972. PubMed ID: 35763090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Analysis of the Readability of Online Sarcoidosis Resources.
    Irshad S; Asif N; Ashraf U; Ashraf H
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58559. PubMed ID: 38770494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Readability, understandability, and quality of retinopathy of prematurity information on the web.
    Yılmaz FH; Tutar MS; Arslan D; Çeri A
    Birth Defects Res; 2021 Jul; 113(12):901-910. PubMed ID: 33594835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability.
    Rai R; Landsberg A; Nguyen A; Wiseman SM
    Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 33712262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Readability assessment of patient educational materials for pediatric spinal deformity from top academic orthopedic institutions.
    Michel C; Dijanic C; Abdelmalek G; Sudah S; Kerrigan D; Gorgy G; Yalamanchili P
    Spine Deform; 2022 Nov; 10(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 35819724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Readability of Printed Online Education Materials on Pituitary Tumors: Untangling a Web of Complexity.
    Ye MJ; Alwani MM; Harper JL; Buren LMV; Bandali EH; Illing EA; Shipchandler TZ; Ting JY
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2020 Nov; 34(6):759-766. PubMed ID: 32460599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of the Quality, Content, and Readability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Kloosterboer A; Yannuzzi NA; Patel NA; Kuriyan AE; Sridhar J
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 137(11):1240-1245. PubMed ID: 31436789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.
    Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.