BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35303521)

  • 1. Negative MDM2/CDK4 immunoreactivity does not fully exclude MDM2/CDK4 amplification in a subset of atypical lipomatous tumor/ well differentiated liposarcoma.
    Machado I; Vargas AC; Maclean F; Llombart-Bosch A
    Pathol Res Pract; 2022 Apr; 232():153839. PubMed ID: 35303521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MDM2 and CDK4 Immunohistochemistry: Should It Be Used in Problematic Differentiated Lipomatous Tumors?: A New Perspective.
    Clay MR; Martinez AP; Weiss SW; Edgar MA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Dec; 40(12):1647-1652. PubMed ID: 27508976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential diagnosis of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: utility of p16 in combination with MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry.
    Kammerer-Jacquet SF; Thierry S; Cabillic F; Lannes M; Burtin F; Henno S; Dugay F; Bouzillé G; Rioux-Leclercq N; Belaud-Rotureau MA; Stock N
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jan; 59():34-40. PubMed ID: 27597521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of MDM2-CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 200 paraffin-embedded tumor samples: utility in diagnosing adipocytic lesions and comparison with immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR.
    Sirvent N; Coindre JM; Maire G; Hostein I; Keslair F; Guillou L; Ranchere-Vince D; Terrier P; Pedeutour F
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Oct; 31(10):1476-89. PubMed ID: 17895748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Atypical Lipomatous Tumor/Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma With Features Mimicking Spindle Cell Lipoma.
    Jebastin JAS; Perry KD; Chitale DA; Mott MP; Sanchez J; Fritchie KJ; Palanisamy N; Williamson SR
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2020 May; 28(3):336-340. PubMed ID: 31672072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma and related mimics with updates. When is molecular testing most cost-effective, necessary, and indicated?
    Kilpatrick SE
    Hum Pathol; 2024 May; 147():82-91. PubMed ID: 38135062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. p16 Expression in Fat Necrosis: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall in the Evaluation of Differentiated Adipocytic Neoplasms.
    Ng W; Messiou C; Smith M; Thway K
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2015 Oct; 23(7):544-8. PubMed ID: 26173427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity of MDM2 amplification and unexpected multiple faint alphoid 12 (alpha 12 satellite sequences) signals in atypical lipomatous tumor.
    Kashima T; Halai D; Ye H; Hing SN; Delaney D; Pollock R; O'Donnell P; Tirabosco R; Flanagan AM
    Mod Pathol; 2012 Oct; 25(10):1384-96. PubMed ID: 22699518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of MDM2/CDK4 amplification in lipomatous soft tissue tumors from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue: comparison of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
    Creytens D; van Gorp J; Ferdinande L; Speel EJ; Libbrecht L
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2015 Feb; 23(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 25679065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lipomas of the Oral Cavity: Utility of MDM2 and CDK4 in Avoiding Overdiagnosis as Atypical Lipomatous Tumor.
    Stojanov IJ; Mariño-Enriquez A; Bahri N; Jo VY; Woo SB
    Head Neck Pathol; 2019 Jun; 13(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 29748845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of MDM2 and CDK4 amplification levels using real-time polymerase chain reaction for the differential diagnosis of liposarcomas and their histologic mimickers.
    Shimada S; Ishizawa T; Ishizawa K; Matsumura T; Hasegawa T; Hirose T
    Hum Pathol; 2006 Sep; 37(9):1123-9. PubMed ID: 16938516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lessons learnt from MDM2 fluorescence in-situ hybridisation analysis of 439 mature lipomatous lesions with an emphasis on atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma lacking cytological atypia.
    Vargas AC; Joy C; Cheah AL; Jones M; Bonar F; Brookwell R; Garrone B; Talbot J; Harraway J; Gill AJ; Maclean FM
    Histopathology; 2022 Jan; 80(2):369-380. PubMed ID: 34523152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coordinated expression and amplification of the MDM2, CDK4, and HMGI-C genes in atypical lipomatous tumours.
    Dei Tos AP; Doglioni C; Piccinin S; Sciot R; Furlanetto A; Boiocchi M; Dal Cin P; Maestro R; Fletcher CD; Tallini G
    J Pathol; 2000 Apr; 190(5):531-6. PubMed ID: 10727978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Utility and Limitations of Immunohistochemistry of p16, CDK4, and MDM2 and Automated Dual-color In Situ Hybridization of MDM2 for the Diagnosis of Challenging Cases of Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma.
    Kobayashi A; Sakuma T; Fujimoto M; Jimbo N; Hirose T
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2019; 27(10):758-763. PubMed ID: 31145104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical value of fluorescence
    Wang W; Li X; Liu P; Dong Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Apr; 55(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 37042132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carboxypeptidase M: a biomarker for the discrimination of well-differentiated liposarcoma from lipoma.
    Erickson-Johnson MR; Seys AR; Roth CW; King AA; Hulshizer RL; Wang X; Asmann YW; Lloyd RV; Jacob EK; Oliveira AM
    Mod Pathol; 2009 Dec; 22(12):1541-7. PubMed ID: 19820690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expression of FRS2 in atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 182 cases with genetic data.
    Jing W; Lan T; Qiu Y; Peng R; Lu Y; Chen H; Chen M; He X; Chen C; Zhang H
    Diagn Pathol; 2021 Oct; 16(1):96. PubMed ID: 34696768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRI characteristics of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma: retrospective comparison with histology and MDM2 gene amplification.
    Brisson M; Kashima T; Delaney D; Tirabosco R; Clarke A; Cro S; Flanagan AM; O'Donnell P
    Skeletal Radiol; 2013 May; 42(5):635-47. PubMed ID: 22987247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can HMGI-C be used as an aid with MDM2 and CDK4 to differentiate liposarcoma subtypes from their mimics?
    Alshenawy H
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 139(6):1073-81. PubMed ID: 23529275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes: a comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data.
    Binh MB; Sastre-Garau X; Guillou L; de Pinieux G; Terrier P; Lagacé R; Aurias A; Hostein I; Coindre JM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2005 Oct; 29(10):1340-7. PubMed ID: 16160477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.