These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35303797)

  • 1. Effect of genotyping strategies on the sustained benefit of single-step genomic BLUP over multiple generations.
    Sánchez-Mayor M; Riggio V; Navarro P; Gutiérrez-Gil B; Haley CS; De la Fuente LF; Arranz JJ; Pong-Wong R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Mar; 54(1):23. PubMed ID: 35303797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
    Howard JT; Rathje TA; Bruns CE; Wilson-Wells DF; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Nov; 96(11):4532-4542. PubMed ID: 30107560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection.
    Boligon AA; Long N; Albuquerque LG; Weigel KA; Gianola D; Rosa GJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4716-22. PubMed ID: 23372045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values.
    Gowane GR; Alex R; Mukherjee A; Vohra V
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Oct; 54(6):339. PubMed ID: 36210357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Most of the benefits from genomic selection can be realized by genotyping a small proportion of available selection candidates.
    Henryon M; Berg P; Ostersen T; Nielsen B; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4681-9. PubMed ID: 23087087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
    Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder program.
    de Hollander CA; Breen VP; Henshall J; Lopes FB; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Mar; 55(1):14. PubMed ID: 36882689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
    Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine.
    Li X; Zhang Z; Liu X; Chen Y
    Animal; 2019 Sep; 13(9):1804-1810. PubMed ID: 30616709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.
    Sollero BP; Howard JT; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2780-2792. PubMed ID: 31115442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Gowane GR; Lee SH; Clark S; Moghaddar N; Al-Mamun HA; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Sep; 136(5):390-407. PubMed ID: 31215699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
    Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
    Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.
    Garcia ALS; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32374831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
    BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9026-34. PubMed ID: 26433415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissecting genetic trends to understand breeding practices in livestock: a maternal pig line example.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Nov; 53(1):89. PubMed ID: 34837954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.