These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35304117)
1. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Miss Rate of Colorectal Neoplasia. Wallace MB; Sharma P; Bhandari P; East J; Antonelli G; Lorenzetti R; Vieth M; Speranza I; Spadaccini M; Desai M; Lukens FJ; Babameto G; Batista D; Singh D; Palmer W; Ramirez F; Palmer R; Lunsford T; Ruff K; Bird-Liebermann E; Ciofoaia V; Arndtz S; Cangemi D; Puddick K; Derfus G; Johal AS; Barawi M; Longo L; Moro L; Repici A; Hassan C Gastroenterology; 2022 Jul; 163(1):295-304.e5. PubMed ID: 35304117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deep Learning Computer-aided Polyp Detection Reduces Adenoma Miss Rate: A United States Multi-center Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study (CADeT-CS Trial). Glissen Brown JR; Mansour NM; Wang P; Chuchuca MA; Minchenberg SB; Chandnani M; Liu L; Gross SA; Sengupta N; Berzin TM Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Jul; 20(7):1499-1507.e4. PubMed ID: 34530161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study. Wang P; Liu P; Glissen Brown JR; Berzin TM; Zhou G; Lei S; Liu X; Li L; Xiao X Gastroenterology; 2020 Oct; 159(4):1252-1261.e5. PubMed ID: 32562721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Zhao S; Wang S; Pan P; Xia T; Chang X; Yang X; Guo L; Meng Q; Yang F; Qian W; Xu Z; Wang Y; Wang Z; Gu L; Wang R; Jia F; Yao J; Li Z; Bai Y Gastroenterology; 2019 May; 156(6):1661-1674.e11. PubMed ID: 30738046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy is associated with a lower adenoma miss rate: a multicenter randomized tandem study. Triantafyllou K; Polymeros D; Apostolopoulos P; Lopes Brandao C; Gkolfakis P; Repici A; Papanikolaou IS; Dinis-Ribeiro M; Alexandrakis G; Hassan C Endoscopy; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 28763808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial. Repici A; Badalamenti M; Maselli R; Correale L; Radaelli F; Rondonotti E; Ferrara E; Spadaccini M; Alkandari A; Fugazza A; Anderloni A; Galtieri PA; Pellegatta G; Carrara S; Di Leo M; Craviotto V; Lamonaca L; Lorenzetti R; Andrealli A; Antonelli G; Wallace M; Sharma P; Rosch T; Hassan C Gastroenterology; 2020 Aug; 159(2):512-520.e7. PubMed ID: 32371116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a Novel Artificial Intelligence System Leads to the Detection of Significantly Higher Number of Adenomas During Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Results From a Large, Prospective, US Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. Desai M; Ausk K; Brannan D; Chhabra R; Chan W; Chiorean M; Gross SA; Girotra M; Haber G; Hogan RB; Jacob B; Jonnalagadda S; Iles-Shih L; Kumar N; Law J; Lee L; Lin O; Mizrahi M; Pacheco P; Parasa S; Phan J; Reeves V; Sethi A; Snell D; Underwood J; Venu N; Visrodia K; Wong A; Winn J; Wright CH; Sharma P Am J Gastroenterol; 2024 Jul; 119(7):1383-1391. PubMed ID: 38235741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted by artificial intelligence: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Kamba S; Tamai N; Saitoh I; Matsui H; Horiuchi H; Kobayashi M; Sakamoto T; Ego M; Fukuda A; Tonouchi A; Shimahara Y; Nishikawa M; Nishino H; Saito Y; Sumiyama K J Gastroenterol; 2021 Aug; 56(8):746-757. PubMed ID: 34218329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial intelligence (AI) real-time detection vs. routine colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Deliwala SS; Hamid K; Barbarawi M; Lakshman H; Zayed Y; Kandel P; Malladi S; Singh A; Bachuwa G; Gurvits GE; Chawla S Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Nov; 36(11):2291-2303. PubMed ID: 33934173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of computer-aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Shah S; Park N; Chehade NEH; Chahine A; Monachese M; Tiritilli A; Moosvi Z; Ortizo R; Samarasena J J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Feb; 38(2):162-176. PubMed ID: 36350048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is artificial intelligence the final answer to missed polyps in colonoscopy? Lui TKL; Leung WK World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 26(35):5248-5255. PubMed ID: 32994685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-Aided Detection Improves Adenomas per Colonoscopy for Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial. Shaukat A; Lichtenstein DR; Somers SC; Chung DC; Perdue DG; Gopal M; Colucci DR; Phillips SA; Marka NA; Church TR; Brugge WR; Gastroenterology; 2022 Sep; 163(3):732-741. PubMed ID: 35643173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endocuff With or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Detection of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial. Lui TK; Lam CP; To EW; Ko MK; Tsui VWM; Liu KS; Hui CK; Cheung MK; Mak LL; Hui RW; Wong SY; Seto WK; Leung WK Am J Gastroenterol; 2024 Jul; 119(7):1318-1325. PubMed ID: 38305278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lower adenoma miss rate with FUSE vs. conventional colonoscopy with proximal retroflexion: a randomized back-to-back trial. Papanikolaou IS; Apostolopoulos P; Tziatzios G; Vlachou E; Sioulas AD; Polymeros D; Karameris A; Panayiotides I; Alexandrakis G; Dimitriadis GD; Triantafyllou K Endoscopy; 2017 May; 49(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28107765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of a novel artificial intelligence system for adenoma detection in daily practice: a prospective nonrandomized comparative study. Zippelius C; Alqahtani SA; Schedel J; Brookman-Amissah D; Muehlenberg K; Federle C; Salzberger A; Schorr W; Pech O Endoscopy; 2022 May; 54(5):465-472. PubMed ID: 34293812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of artificial intelligence-based bowel preparation assessment in screening colonoscopy (with video). Yao L; Xiong H; Li Q; Wang W; Wu Z; Tan X; Luo C; You H; Zhang C; Zhang L; Lu Z; Yu H; Chen H Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Oct; 100(4):728-736.e9. PubMed ID: 38636818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New insights on missed colonic lesions during colonoscopy through artificial intelligence-assisted real-time detection (with video). Lui TKL; Hui CKY; Tsui VWM; Cheung KS; Ko MKL; Foo DCC; Mak LY; Yeung CK; Lui TH; Wong SY; Leung WK Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Jan; 93(1):193-200.e1. PubMed ID: 32376335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polyp detection with colonoscopy assisted by the GI Genius artificial intelligence endoscopy module compared with standard colonoscopy in routine colonoscopy practice (COLO-DETECT): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Seager A; Sharp L; Neilson LJ; Brand A; Hampton JS; Lee TJW; Evans R; Vale L; Whelpton J; Bestwick N; Rees CJ; Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Oct; 9(10):911-923. PubMed ID: 39153491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]