These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35304534)

  • 1. An experimental method for efficiently evaluating the size-resolved sampling efficiency of liquid-absorption aerosol samplers.
    Guo J; Zheng X; Qin T; Lv M; Zhang W; Song X; Qiu H; Hu L; Zhang L; Zhou D; Sun Y; Yang W
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4745. PubMed ID: 35304534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of high flow rate samplers for respirable particle collection.
    Lee T; Kim SW; Chisholm WP; Slaven J; Harper M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Aug; 54(6):697-709. PubMed ID: 20660144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehensive performance evaluation of six bioaerosol samplers based on an aerosol wind tunnel.
    Guo J; Lv M; Liu Z; Qin T; Qiu H; Zhang L; Lu J; Hu L; Yang W; Zhou D
    Environ Int; 2024 Jan; 183():108402. PubMed ID: 38150804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.
    Koehler KA; Anthony TR; Van Dyke M; Volckens J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):194-206. PubMed ID: 21965462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of fifteen respirable aerosol samplers used in occupational hygiene.
    Görner P; Wrobel R; Micka V; Skoda V; Denis J; Fabriès JF
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 11137698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New experimental methods for the development and evaluation of aerosol samplers.
    Brixey LA; Paik SY; Evans DE; Vincent JH
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 12400907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration of high flow rate thoracic-size selective samplers.
    Lee T; Thorpe A; Cauda E; Harper M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016; 13(6):D93-8. PubMed ID: 26891196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sampling Efficiency and Performance of Selected Thoracic Aerosol Samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Boivin A; Bau S
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Aug; 61(7):784-796. PubMed ID: 28810686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of six inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Li SN; Lundgren DA; Rovell-Rixx D
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 10976680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the UNC Passive Aerosol Sampler Model Based on Comparison with Commonly Used Aerosol Sampling Methods.
    Shirdel M; Andersson BM; Bergdahl IA; Sommar JN; Wingfors H; Liljelind IE
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Mar; 62(3):328-338. PubMed ID: 29300818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction of sampler-to-sampler comparisons based on aerosol size distribution.
    O'Shaughnessy PT; Lo J; Golla V; Nakatsu J; Tillery MI; Reynolds S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Apr; 4(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 17365494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collection efficiencies of high flow rate personal respirable samplers when measuring Arizona road dust and analysis of quartz by x-ray diffraction.
    Stacey P; Lee T; Thorpe A; Roberts P; Frost G; Harper M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 May; 58(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 24470535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance characteristics of PM10 samplers under calm air conditions.
    Lai CY; Chen CC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Apr; 50(4):578-87. PubMed ID: 10786010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Development and Performance Evaluation of a Supermicron Particle Generation System for Aerosol Instrument Calibration].
    Chen XT; Jiang JK; Deng JG; Duan L; Hao JM
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2016 Mar; 37(3):789-94. PubMed ID: 27337867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the sampling efficiencies of a range of atmosphere samplers when collecting polymeric diphenylmethane di-isocyanate (MDI) aerosols.
    Hext PM; Booth K; Dharmarajan V; Karoly WJ; Parekh PP; Spence M
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):346-57. PubMed ID: 12746078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a 25-mm disposable sampler relative to the inhalable aerosol convention.
    Borsh FB; Sleeth DK; Handy RG; Pahler LF; Andrews R; Ashley K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Sep; 16(9):634-642. PubMed ID: 31298629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 portable aerosol spectrometer to the TSI 3321 aerodynamic particle sizer for dry particles.
    Peters TM; Ott D; O'Shaughnessy PT
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Nov; 50(8):843-50. PubMed ID: 17041244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.