These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35304683)

  • 1. Qualitative and quantitative comparison of ERGs with contact lens and adhesive skin electrodes.
    Chen D; Greenstein VC; Brodie SE
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2022 Jun; 144(3):203-215. PubMed ID: 35304683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison between subtraction skin electrodes and corneal-contact electrodes in flash electroretinograms].
    Kaid T; Matsunag M; Hanaya J; Nakamura Y; Ohtani S; Miyat K; Kondo M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Jan; 117(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 23424970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash electroretinography in rodents.
    Bayer AU; Cook P; Brodie SE; Maag KP; Mittag T
    Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(17):2173-85. PubMed ID: 11448710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of ERGs recorded with skin and corneal-contact electrodes in normal children and adults.
    Bradshaw K; Hansen R; Fulton A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 109(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 15675199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial differences in corneal electroretinogram potentials measured in rat with a contact lens electrode array.
    Krakova Y; Tajalli H; Thongpang S; Derafshi Z; Ban T; Rahmani S; Selner AN; Al-Tarouti A; Williams JC; Hetling JR
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 129(3):151-66. PubMed ID: 25266461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skin ERGs: their effectiveness in paediatric visual assessment, confounding factors, and comparison with ERGs recorded using various types of corneal electrode.
    Kriss A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 May; 16(2-3):137-46. PubMed ID: 8089032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Studies on skin-electrode ERG in the closed-eye state.
    Uchida K; Mitsuyu-Tsuboi M; Honda Y
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1979; 16(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 438933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between Dawson, Trick, and Litzkow electrode and contact lens electrodes used in clinical electroretinography.
    Kuze M; Uji Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2000; 44(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 10974293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing DTL microfiber and Neuroline skin electrode in the Mini Ganzfeld ERG.
    Lapkovska A; Palmowski-Wolfe AM; Todorova MG
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():137. PubMed ID: 27491453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electroretinograms Recorded with Skin Electrodes from Post-Vitrectomy Silicone Oil Filled Eyes with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Kanai K; Igawa Y; Tachibana M; Yoshikawa Y; Katsumoto T; Shibuya M; Kawagoe T; Makita J; Shinoda K
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2024; 18():2167-2174. PubMed ID: 39100695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of the amplitude size and the reproducibility of three different electrodes to record the corneal flash electroretinogram in rodents.
    Bayer AU; Mittag T; Cook P; Brodie SE; Podos SM; Maag KP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1999; 98(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 10945443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of light- and dark-adapted ERGs using a mydriasis-free, portable system: clinical classifications and normative data.
    Liu H; Ji X; Dhaliwal S; Rahman SN; McFarlane M; Tumber A; Locke J; Wright T; Vincent A; Westall C
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 137(3):169-181. PubMed ID: 30357588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal Potential Maps Measured With Multi-Electrode Electroretinography in Rat Eyes With Experimental Lesions.
    Derafshi Z; Kunzer BE; Mugler EM; Rokhmanova N; Park DW; Tajalli H; Shetty K; Ma Z; Williams JC; Hetling JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Jun; 58(7):2863-2873. PubMed ID: 28586910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes.
    Beeler P; Barthelmes D; Sutter FK; Helbig H; Fleischhauer JC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 17458789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of mild cataract on ISCEV standard electroretinogram recorded from mydriatic eyes.
    Tanikawa A; Suzuki K; Nomura R; Tanaka H; Mizuguchi T; Shimada Y; Horiguchi M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 142(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 32918674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A contact lens electrode with built-in high intensity white light-emitting diodes. A contact lens electrode with built-in white LEDs.
    Kondo M; Piao CH; Tanikawa A; Horiguchi M; Miyake Y
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2001 Jan; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 11475361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing.
    Yin H; Pardue MT
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 108(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15104170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of topical anesthesia on the rat electroretinogram.
    Sandalon S; Ofri R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2009 Apr; 118(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 18665412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and results of photopic flash electroretinogram performed with skin electrodes in infants.
    Bui Quoc E; Albuisson E; Ingster-Moati I
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 21748726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERG electrode in pediatric patients: comparison of DTL fiber, PVA-gel, and non-corneal skin electrodes.
    Coupland SG; Janaky M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1989 Apr; 71(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 2791850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.