164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35304940)
1. Abundant and persistent sulfur-oxidizing microbial populations are responsive to hypoxia in the Chesapeake Bay.
Arora-Williams K; Holder C; Secor M; Ellis H; Xia M; Gnanadesikan A; Preheim SP
Environ Microbiol; 2022 May; 24(5):2315-2332. PubMed ID: 35304940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamics of microbial populations mediating biogeochemical cycling in a freshwater lake.
Arora-Williams K; Olesen SW; Scandella BP; Delwiche K; Spencer SJ; Myers EM; Abraham S; Sooklal A; Preheim SP
Microbiome; 2018 Sep; 6(1):165. PubMed ID: 30227897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shifts in coastal sediment oxygenation cause pronounced changes in microbial community composition and associated metabolism.
Broman E; Sjöstedt J; Pinhassi J; Dopson M
Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):96. PubMed ID: 28793929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbial Activities and Selection from Surface Ocean to Subseafloor on the Namibian Continental Shelf.
Vuillemin A; Coskun ÖK; Orsi WD
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2022 May; 88(9):e0021622. PubMed ID: 35404072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) in Chesapeake Bay sediments.
Rich JJ; Dale OR; Song B; Ward BB
Microb Ecol; 2008 Feb; 55(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 17619213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic evidence for sulfur intermediates as new biogeochemical hubs in a model aquatic microbial ecosystem.
Vigneron A; Cruaud P; Culley AI; Couture RM; Lovejoy C; Vincent WF
Microbiome; 2021 Feb; 9(1):46. PubMed ID: 33593438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbial community structure in deep natural gas-bearing aquifers subjected to sulfate-containing fluid injection.
Katayama T; Yoshioka H; Yamanaka T; Takeuchi M; Muramoto Y; Usami J; Ikeda H; Sakata S
J Biosci Bioeng; 2019 Jan; 127(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 30082219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microbial communities related to the sulfur cycle in the Sansha Yongle Blue Hole.
Sun K; Yu M; Zhu XY; Xue CX; Zhang Y; Chen X; Yao P; Chen L; Fu L; Yang Z; Zhang XH
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Aug; 11(5):e0114923. PubMed ID: 37623326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Light-dependent sulfide oxidation in the anoxic zone of the Chesapeake Bay can be explained by small populations of phototrophic bacteria.
Findlay AJ; Bennett AJ; Hanson TE; Luther GW
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2015 Nov; 81(21):7560-9. PubMed ID: 26296727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microbial community structures and in situ sulfate-reducing and sulfur-oxidizing activities in biofilms developed on mortar specimens in a corroded sewer system.
Satoh H; Odagiri M; Ito T; Okabe S
Water Res; 2009 Oct; 43(18):4729-39. PubMed ID: 19709714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal and Vertical Variation in Microbial Community Composition in Response to Physicochemical Characteristics in a Water Column of Highly Eutrophied Jinhae Bay, South Korea.
Lee J; Lim JH; Park J; Kim IN
J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018; 28(2):65-77. PubMed ID: 29961061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing from Manao-Pee cave, Thailand, reveals insight into the microbial community structure and its metabolic potential.
Wiseschart A; Mhuantong W; Tangphatsornruang S; Chantasingh D; Pootanakit K
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):144. PubMed ID: 31248378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distribution of Sulfate-Reducing Communities from Estuarine to Marine Bay Waters.
Colin Y; Goñi-Urriza M; Gassie C; Carlier E; Monperrus M; Guyoneaud R
Microb Ecol; 2017 Jan; 73(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 27581035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linking seasonal inorganic nitrogen shift to the dynamics of microbial communities in the Chesapeake Bay.
Hong Y; Xu X; Kan J; Chen F
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Apr; 98(7):3219-29. PubMed ID: 24220790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal and spatial variability in the distribution of Vibrio vulnificus in the Chesapeake Bay: a hindcast study.
Banakar V; Constantin de Magny G; Jacobs J; Murtugudde R; Huq A; Wood RJ; Colwell RR
Ecohealth; 2011 Dec; 8(4):456-67. PubMed ID: 22302219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainty in model predictions of Vibrio vulnificus response to climate variability and change: a Chesapeake Bay case study.
Urquhart EA; Zaitchik BF; Waugh DW; Guikema SD; Del Castillo CE
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e98256. PubMed ID: 24874082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time series metagenomic sampling of the Thermopyles, Greece, geothermal springs reveals stable microbial communities dominated by novel sulfur-oxidizing chemoautotrophs.
Meziti A; Nikouli E; Hatt JK; Konstantinidis KT; Kormas KA
Environ Microbiol; 2021 Jul; 23(7):3710-3726. PubMed ID: 33350070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The vertical distribution of prokaryotes in the surface sediment of Jiaolong cold seep at the northern South China Sea.
Wu Y; Qiu JW; Qian PY; Wang Y
Extremophiles; 2018 May; 22(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 29442249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene transfer agent (GTA) genes reveal diverse and dynamic Roseobacter and Rhodobacter populations in the Chesapeake Bay.
Zhao Y; Wang K; Budinoff C; Buchan A; Lang A; Jiao N; Chen F
ISME J; 2009 Mar; 3(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 19020557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interrogation of Chesapeake Bay sediment microbial communities for intrinsic alkane-utilizing potential under anaerobic conditions.
Johnson JM; Wawrik B; Isom C; Boling WB; Callaghan AV
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2015 Feb; 91(2):1-14. PubMed ID: 25764556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
