These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35305498)

  • 1. Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper.
    Whaley P; Piggott T; Morgan RL; Hoffmann S; Tsaioun K; Schwingshackl L; Ansari MT; Thayer KA; Schünemann HJ
    Environ Int; 2022 Apr; 162():107109. PubMed ID: 35305498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper.
    Whaley P; Piggott T; Morgan RL; Hoffmann S; Tsaioun K; Schwingshackl L; Ansari MT; Thayer KA; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jun; 146():32-46. PubMed ID: 35219805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.
    Brozek JL; Canelo-Aybar C; Akl EA; Bowen JM; Bucher J; Chiu WA; Cronin M; Djulbegovic B; Falavigna M; Guyatt GH; Gordon AA; Hilton Boon M; Hutubessy RCW; Joore MA; Katikireddi V; LaKind J; Langendam M; Manja V; Magnuson K; Mathioudakis AG; Meerpohl J; Mertz D; Mezencev R; Morgan R; Morgano GP; Mustafa R; O'Flaherty M; Patlewicz G; Riva JJ; Posso M; Rooney A; Schlosser PM; Schwartz L; Shemilt I; Tarride JE; Thayer KA; Tsaioun K; Vale L; Wambaugh J; Wignall J; Williams A; Xie F; Zhang Y; Schünemann HJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():138-150. PubMed ID: 32980429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences: Risk of bias and indirectness].
    Kaiser L; Hübscher M; Rissling O; Schulz S; Langer G; Meerpohl J; Schwingshackl L
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2021 Feb; 160():78-88. PubMed ID: 33461905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GRADE concept 4: rating the certainty of evidence when study interventions or comparators differ from PICO targets.
    Goldkuhle M; Guyatt GH; Kreuzberger N; Akl EA; Dahm P; van Dalen EC; Hemkens LG; Klugar M; Mustafa RA; Nonino F; Schünemann HJ; Trivella M; Skoetz N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():40-48. PubMed ID: 37146659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [How to interpret the certainty of evidence based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation)].
    Schwingshackl L; Rüschemeyer G; Meerpohl JJ
    Urologe A; 2021 Apr; 60(4):444-454. PubMed ID: 33620513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of an online course on agreement rates of the certainty of evidence assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach: a before-and-after study.
    Dorneles G; Stein C; Araujo CP; Parahiba S; da Rosa B; Gräf DD; Belli KC; Basmaji J; Maior MDCLS; Vidal ÁT; Colpani V; Falavigna M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Aug; 172():111407. PubMed ID: 38838964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating biological plausibility in supporting evidence for action through systematic reviews in public health.
    Dailey J; Rosman L; Silbergeld EK
    Public Health; 2018 Dec; 165():48-57. PubMed ID: 30368168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness.
    Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():94-104. PubMed ID: 29452223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks.
    Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Zuk V; Vandvik PO; Alba AC; Mustafa R; Vernooij R; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Munn Z; Roshanov P; Riley R; Schandelmaier S; Kuijpers T; Siemieniuk R; Canelo-Aybar C; Schunemann H; Iorio A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():62-70. PubMed ID: 31982539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The GRADE approach, Part 1: how to assess the certainty of the evidence.
    Kirmayr M; Quilodrán C; Valente B; Loezar C; Garegnani L; Franco JVA
    Medwave; 2021 Mar; 21(2):e8109. PubMed ID: 33830974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy.
    Schünemann HJ; Mustafa RA; Brozek J; Steingart KR; Leeflang M; Murad MH; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Jaeschke R; Lange S; Meerpohl J; Langendam M; Hultcrantz M; Vist GE; Akl EA; Helfand M; Santesso N; Hooft L; Scholten R; Rosen M; Rutjes A; Crowther M; Muti P; Raatz H; Ansari MT; Williams J; Kunz R; Harris J; Rodriguez IA; Kohli M; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():129-141. PubMed ID: 32060007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the Certainty of the Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Importance, Process, and Use.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt GH
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39218429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indirectness (transferability) is critical when considering existing economic evaluations for GRADE clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review.
    Riva JJ; Bhatt M; Martins CC; Brunarski DJ; Busse JW; Xie F; Schünemann HJ; Brozek JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 148():81-92. PubMed ID: 35462047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Quality of Perinatal Trials: Making the GRADE.
    Walsh V; McGuire W; Halliday HL
    Neonatology; 2021; 118(3):378-383. PubMed ID: 33946079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Mustafa RA; Siemieniuk RAC; Murad MH; Agoritsas T; Izcovich A; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():77-85. PubMed ID: 30529648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence.
    Gartlehner G; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Devane D; Kahwati L; Viswanathan M; King VJ; Qaseem A; Akl E; Schuenemann HJ;
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2024 Jan; 29(1):50-54. PubMed ID: 37076264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group.
    Hilton Boon M; Thomson H; Shaw B; Akl EA; Lhachimi SK; López-Alcalde J; Klugar M; Choi L; Saz-Parkinson Z; Mustafa RA; Langendam MW; Crane O; Morgan RL; Rehfuess E; Johnston BC; Chong LY; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Katikireddi SV;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 135():42-53. PubMed ID: 33476768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Certainty ranges facilitated explicit and transparent judgments regarding evidence credibility.
    Tikkinen KAO; Craigie S; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():46-51. PubMed ID: 30145323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.