These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35306096)

  • 1. Retrospective composite analysis of StartReact data indicates sex differences in simple reaction time are not attributable to response preparation.
    Sadler CM; Peters KJ; Santangelo CM; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    Behav Brain Res; 2022 May; 426():113839. PubMed ID: 35306096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Dec; 122(6):2541-2547. PubMed ID: 31642402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.
    Drummond NM; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):379-388. PubMed ID: 27738717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sub-threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation applied after the go-signal facilitates reaction time under control but not startle conditions.
    Smith V; Carlsen AN
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 47(4):333-345. PubMed ID: 29356214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements.
    Maslovat D; Santangelo CM; Carlsen AN
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6532. PubMed ID: 37085607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Slowed reaction times in cognitive fatigue are not attributable to declines in motor preparation.
    Peters KJ; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Nov; 240(11):3033-3047. PubMed ID: 36227342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Triggering Mechanisms for Motor Actions: The Effects of Expectation on Reaction Times to Intense Acoustic Stimuli.
    Leow LA; Uchida A; Egberts JL; Riek S; Lipp OV; Tresilian J; Marinovic W
    Neuroscience; 2018 Nov; 393():226-235. PubMed ID: 30326292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Timeline of Motor Preparatory State Prior to Response Initiation: Evidence from Startle.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jan; 397():80-93. PubMed ID: 30471355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Excitability of the pathways mediating the startle reaction before execution of a voluntary movement.
    Kumru H; Valls-Solé J
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 16273394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the StartReact Effect Apply to First-Trial Reactive Movements?
    Sutter K; Nonnekes J; Dibilio V; Geurts AC; Weerdesteyn V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153129. PubMed ID: 27077654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An intense electrical stimulus can elicit a StartReact effect but with decreased incidence and later onset of the startle reflex.
    Daher E; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Oct; 242(10):2405-2417. PubMed ID: 39136724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Carlsen AN; May C; Forgaard CJ; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():36-42. PubMed ID: 25919668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.
    Stevenson AJ; Chiu C; Maslovat D; Chua R; Gick B; Blouin JS; Franks IM
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jun; 269():21-34. PubMed ID: 24680855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect.
    McInnes AN; Castellote JM; Kofler M; Honeycutt CF; Lipp OV; Riek S; Tresilian JR; Marinovic W
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 53(5):1545-1568. PubMed ID: 32935412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduced motor preparation during dual-task performance: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carter MJ; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2673-83. PubMed ID: 26026810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bimanual but not unimanual finger movements are triggered by a startling acoustic stimulus: evidence for increased reticulospinal drive for bimanual responses.
    Maslovat D; Teku F; Smith V; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Dec; 124(6):1832-1838. PubMed ID: 33026906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.
    Forgaard CJ; Franks IM; Bennett K; Maslovat D; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 236(2):365-379. PubMed ID: 29151141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Startle-induced reaction time shortening is not modified by prepulse inhibition.
    Valls-Solé J; Kofler M; Kumru H; Castellote JM; Sanegre MT
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 165(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 15942734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):986-94. PubMed ID: 27281747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects.
    Carlsen AN; Dakin CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 16874516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.