These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35306326)

  • 1. But that's possible! Infants, pupils, and impossible events.
    Jackson IR; Sirois S
    Infant Behav Dev; 2022 May; 67():101710. PubMed ID: 35306326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Infant cognition: going full factorial with pupil dilation.
    Jackson I; Sirois S
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jul; 12(4):670-9. PubMed ID: 19635092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pupil collaboration: A multi-lab, multi-method analysis of goal attribution in infants.
    Sirois S; Brisson J; Blaser E; Calignano G; Donenfeld J; Hepach R; Hochmann JR; Kaldy Z; Liszkowski U; Mayer M; Ross-Sheehy S; Russo S; Valenza E
    Infant Behav Dev; 2023 Nov; 73():101890. PubMed ID: 37944367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do infants recognize joint attention?
    Gustafsson E; Brisson J; Beaulieu C; Mainville M; Mailloux D; Sirois S
    Infant Behav Dev; 2015 Aug; 40():64-72. PubMed ID: 26036712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased visual interest and affective responses to impossible figures in early infancy.
    Krause C; Longo D; Shuwairi S
    Infant Behav Dev; 2019 Nov; 57():101341. PubMed ID: 31382134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.
    Poulin-Dubois D; Brooker I; Chow V
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2009; 37():55-104. PubMed ID: 19673160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does surprise enhance infant memory? Assessing the impact of the encoding context on subsequent object recognition.
    Csink V; Mareschal D; Gliga T
    Infancy; 2021 Mar; 26(2):303-318. PubMed ID: 33405346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pupillometry reveals communication-induced object expectations in 12- but not 8-month-old infants.
    Pätzold W; Liszkowski U
    Dev Sci; 2019 Nov; 22(6):e12832. PubMed ID: 30942933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infant and adult perceptions of possible and impossible body movements: an eye-tracking study.
    Morita T; Slaughter V; Katayama N; Kitazaki M; Kakigi R; Itakura S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Nov; 113(3):401-14. PubMed ID: 22906302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pupillometric VoE paradigm reveals that 18- but not 10-month-olds spontaneously represent occluded objects (but not empty sets).
    Pätzold W; Liszkowski U
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230913. PubMed ID: 32330136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring individual differences in infants' looking preferences for impossible events: The Early Multidimensional Curiosity Scale.
    Lee N; Lazaro V; Wang JJ; Şen HH; Lucca K
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1015649. PubMed ID: 36817372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dogs' looking times and pupil dilation response reveal expectations about contact causality.
    Völter CJ; Huber L
    Biol Lett; 2021 Dec; 17(12):20210465. PubMed ID: 34932925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The pupillometry of the possible: an investigation of infants' representation of alternative possibilities.
    Cesana-Arlotti N; Varga B; Téglás E
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 377(1866):20210343. PubMed ID: 36314157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stable individual differences in infants' responses to violations of intuitive physics.
    Perez J; Feigenson L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jul; 118(27):. PubMed ID: 34183399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pupil Dilation and Object Permanence in Infants.
    Sirois S; Jackson IR
    Infancy; 2012 Jan; 17(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 32693502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probing infants' sensitivity to pupil size when viewing eyes.
    Haynes KT; Kelsey CM; Grossmann T
    Infancy; 2021 Mar; 26(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 33529476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Décalage in infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: converging evidence from action tasks.
    Hespos SJ; Baillargeon R
    Cognition; 2006 Mar; 99(2):B31-41. PubMed ID: 15939414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When the ordinary seems unexpected: evidence for incremental physical knowledge in young infants.
    Luo Y; Baillargeon R
    Cognition; 2005 Apr; 95(3):297-328. PubMed ID: 15788161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating looking and social looking measures as an index of infant violation of expectation.
    Dunn K; Bremner JG
    Dev Sci; 2017 Nov; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 27781330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of performance on an automated visual recognition memory task in 7.5-month-old infants.
    Dzwilewski KLC; Merced-Nieves FM; Aguiar A; Korrick SA; Schantz SL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2020; 81():106904. PubMed ID: 32485220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.