These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35307169)

  • 1. Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Online Resources on Unspecified Kidney Donation.
    Stavropoulou-Tatla S; Awal DH; Fardanesh A; McCaig F; Hossain MA
    Transplant Proc; 2022 Apr; 54(3):582-586. PubMed ID: 35307169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
    Aboalshamat K
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
    Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.
    Kaya E; Görmez S
    Rheumatol Int; 2022 Nov; 42(11):1965-1972. PubMed ID: 35763090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis.
    Yurdakul OV; Kilicoglu MS; Bagcier F
    Arch Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Nov; 65(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 33166440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.
    Martin CA; Khan S; Lee R; Do AT; Sridhar J; Crowell EL; Bowden EC
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(5):525-530. PubMed ID: 35301989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.
    Raja H; Patel K
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Sep; 105(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 36374281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
    Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Health Information on Halitosis: Infodemiological Study.
    Aboalshamat K
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Aug; 26():e54072. PubMed ID: 39196637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on anosmia.
    Raja H; Lodhi S
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Feb; 106(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 37051757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
    Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability, reliability and credibility of online patient information on skin grafts.
    Heaven CL; Patel C; Ahmadi O; Mathy JA
    Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 64(1):e57-e64. PubMed ID: 36354108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain.
    Ozduran E; Büyükçoban S
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13686. PubMed ID: 35880220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
    Awal DH; Mills C
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Online Patient Education Material About Dysphagia.
    Steiner SM; Slavych BK; Zraick RI
    Dysphagia; 2023 Jun; 38(3):990-1000. PubMed ID: 36205800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.