These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35307183)

  • 1. Breeding schemes with optimum-contribution selection or truncation selection for beef cattle destined for use on dairy females.
    Hjortø L; Andersen T; Kargo M; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 May; 105(5):4314-4323. PubMed ID: 35307183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-selection against a lethal recessive allele in breeding schemes with optimum-contribution selection or truncation selection.
    Hjortø L; Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):75. PubMed ID: 34551728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive technologies combine well with genomic selection in dairy breeding programs.
    Thomasen JR; Willam A; Egger-Danner C; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Feb; 99(2):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 26686703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of kinship matrices on genetic gain and inbreeding with optimum contribution selection in a genomic dairy cattle breeding program.
    Gautason E; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):48. PubMed ID: 37460999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection with inbreeding control in simulated young bull schemes for local dairy cattle breeds.
    Gandini G; Stella A; Del Corvo M; Jansen GB
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1790-8. PubMed ID: 24440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 11929623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation study on the efficiencies of MOET nucleus breeding schemes applying marker assisted selection in dairy cattle.
    Luo W; Wang Y; Zhang Y
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Mar; 52(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 19294355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased genetic gains in sheep, beef and dairy breeding programs from using female reproductive technologies combined with optimal contribution selection and genomic breeding values.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):70. PubMed ID: 26370143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pedigree relationships to control inbreeding in optimum-contribution selection realise more genetic gain than genomic relationships.
    Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Su G; Nielsen HM; Gebregiwergis GT; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):39. PubMed ID: 31286868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of advanced Optimum Contribution Selection in small-scale breeding schemes: prospects and challenges in Vorderwald cattle.
    Kohl S; Wellmann R; Herold P
    Animal; 2020 Mar; 14(3):452-463. PubMed ID: 31597583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expected increases in genetic merit from using optimized contributions in two livestock populations of beef cattle and sheep.
    Avendaño S; Villanueva B; Woolliams JA
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Dec; 81(12):2964-75. PubMed ID: 14677851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle: Strong positive interaction between use of genotypic information and intensive use of young bulls on genetic gain.
    Buch LH; Sørensen MK; Berg P; Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Apr; 129(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 22394236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing pure line breeding strategies utilizing reproductive technologies.
    Meuwissen TH
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Sep; 81 Suppl 2():47-54. PubMed ID: 9777511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stochastic modeling of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer breeding schemes in small closed dairy cattle populations.
    Jeon GJ; Mao IL; Jensen J; Ferris TA
    J Dairy Sci; 1990 Jul; 73(7):1938-44. PubMed ID: 2229596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic gain in dairy cattle populations is increased using sexed semen in commercial herds.
    Sørensen MK; Voergaard J; Pedersen LD; Berg P; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Aug; 128(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 21749473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing female allocation to reproductive technologies considering merit, inbreeding and cost in nucleus breeding programmes with genomic selection.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 30585664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.