These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35307183)

  • 41. Evaluation of the genetic trend of milk yield in the multiple ovulation and embryo transfer populations of dairy cows, using stochastic simulation.
    Hossein-Zadeh NG
    C R Biol; 2010 Oct; 333(10):710-5. PubMed ID: 20965440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations.
    Makanjuola BO; Miglior F; Abdalla EA; Maltecca C; Schenkel FS; Baes CF
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5183-5199. PubMed ID: 32278553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Investigating conception rate for beef service sires bred to dairy cows and heifers.
    McWhorter TM; Hutchison JL; Norman HD; Cole JB; Fok GC; Lourenco DAL; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Nov; 103(11):10374-10382. PubMed ID: 32896403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Genomic mating as sustainable breeding for Chinese indigenous Ningxiang pigs.
    He J; Wu XL; Zeng Q; Li H; Ma H; Jiang J; Rosa GJM; Gianola D; Tait RG; Bauck S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236629. PubMed ID: 32797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding: overlapping generations.
    Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2575-83. PubMed ID: 9814896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2000; 32(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 14736390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Using embryo sexing within closed mixed multiple ovulation and embryo transfer schemes for selection on dairy cattle.
    Colleau JJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):3973-84. PubMed ID: 1757636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. New cycle, same old mistakes? Overlapping vs. discrete generations in long-term recurrent selection.
    Labroo MR; Rutkoski JE
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):736. PubMed ID: 36316650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Minimizing inbreeding by managing genetic contributions across generations.
    Sánchez L; Bijma P; Woolliams JA
    Genetics; 2003 Aug; 164(4):1589-95. PubMed ID: 12930762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Structure of breeding programs to capitalize on reproductive technology for genetic improvement.
    Dekkers JC
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Oct; 75(10):2880-91. PubMed ID: 1430490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes.
    Bijma P; Van Arendonk JA; Woolliams JA
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Apr; 79(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 11325188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Genetic gain and inbreeding from simulation of different genomic mating schemes for pig improvement.
    Zhao F; Zhang P; Wang X; Akdemir D; Garrick D; He J; Wang L
    J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2023 Jun; 14(1):87. PubMed ID: 37309010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Genomic rotational crossbreeding with advanced optimum contribution selection methods applied to simulated German Angler and German Holstein dairy cattle populations.
    Stock J; Esfandyari H; Wellmann R; Hinrichs D; Bennewitz J
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Mar; 140(2):121-131. PubMed ID: 36449261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Purebreeding with sexed semen and crossbreeding with semen from double-muscled sires to improve beef production from dairy herds: Live and slaughter performances of crossbred calves.
    Bittante G; Negrini R; Bergamaschi M; Ni Q; Patel N; Toledo-Alvarado H; Cecchinato A
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Mar; 104(3):3210-3220. PubMed ID: 33358793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Ansari-Mahyari S; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Thomsen H; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1628-39. PubMed ID: 18349255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Carcass characteristics of cattle differing in Jersey proportion.
    Berry DP; Judge MJ; Evans RD; Buckley F; Cromie AR
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11052-11060. PubMed ID: 30268620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Estimating variance components and breeding values for number of oocytes and number of embryos in dairy cattle using a single-step genomic evaluation.
    Cornelissen MAMC; Mullaart E; Van der Linde C; Mulder HA
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jun; 100(6):4698-4705. PubMed ID: 28365120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.