These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35308502)

  • 1. Comparison of Non-contact Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Measurements in Non-pathologic High Myopia.
    Wang P; Song Y; Lin F; Wang Z; Gao X; Cheng W; Chen M; Peng Y; Liu Y; Zhang X; Chen S
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():819715. PubMed ID: 35308502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different Effects of Aging on Intraocular Pressures Measured by Three Different Tonometers.
    Sugihara K; Tanito M
    J Clin Med; 2021 Sep; 10(18):. PubMed ID: 34575313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive models for IOPs measured with NCT, GAT, and ORA among patients undergoing SMILE.
    Han T; Shi W; Chen Y; Shen Y; Xu Y; Zhou X
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():1030458. PubMed ID: 36532578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry--a comparative study.
    Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Lindén C
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 18093261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after corneal refractive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang H; Sun Z; Li L; Sun R; Zhang H
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 31924174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
    Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Easyton transpalpebral tonometry and Perkins, iCare iC100 and Corvis ST, and the influence of corneal and anterior scleral thickness.
    Salazar-Quiñones L; Fernández-Vigo JI; Pérez-Quiñones Y; Montolío-Marzo E; García-Bella J; Morales-Fernandez L; Sánchez-Del-Hoyo R; García-Feijóo J; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 43(11):4121-4129. PubMed ID: 37632576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-dependency of ocular parameters: a cross sectional study of young and elderly healthy subjects.
    Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Ambarki K; Eklund A; Lindén C
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 253(11):1979-83. PubMed ID: 26267751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure.
    Ma J; Wang Y; Hao W; Jhanji V
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31432352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
    Özcura F; Yildirim N; Şahin A; Çolak E
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 25938044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Comparison of 898 Eyes.
    Bao B; Diaconita V; Schulz DC; Hutnik C
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(6):435-439. PubMed ID: 32672578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Oh JH; Yoo C; Kim YY; Kim HM; Song JS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 18843499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature.
    Andreanos K; Koutsandrea C; Papaconstantinou D; Diagourtas A; Kotoulas A; Dimitrakas P; Moschos MM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():2477-2484. PubMed ID: 28003737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of topical anesthetic and fluorescein on non-contact tonometry measurements using ultra-high-speed dynamic Scheimpflug.
    Macedo M; Hatanaka M; Barboza WL; Mingione GM; Ambrósio R; Susanna R
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17864. PubMed ID: 37857798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure relationship in eyes with and without previous LASIK: comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with pneumatonometer.
    Bayraktar S; Bayraktar Z
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 15751244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of refractive errors on IOP measurement by rebound tonometry (ICare) and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Avitabile T; Longo A; Rocca D; Amato R; Gagliano C; Castaing M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 248(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 19727794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.