198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35310063)
1. Evaluation of Corvis ST tonometer with the updated software in glaucoma practice.
Halkiadakis I; Tzimis V; Gryparis A; Markopoulos I; Konstadinidou V; Zintzaras E; Tzakos M
Int J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 35310063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST, non-contact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in children with ocular hypertension and related factors.
Li HG; Chen YH; Lin F; Li SY; Liu QH; Yin CG; Chen XY; Zhang XJ; Qu Y; Hui YN
Int J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(10):1601-1607. PubMed ID: 37854370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal Deformation Parameters Provided by the Corvis-ST Pachy-Tonometer in Healthy Subjects and Glaucoma Patients.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Felletti M; Grasso L; Brusini P
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):568-74. PubMed ID: 25318572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.
Ye Y; Yang Y; Fan Y; Lan M; Yu K; Yu M
J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.
Vinciguerra R; Rehman S; Vallabh NA; Batterbury M; Czanner G; Choudhary A; Cheeseman R; Elsheikh A; Willoughby CE
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 104(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30923134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of intraocular pressure obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer, Corvis ST and an airpuff tonometer in healthy adults.
Karmiris E; Tsiripidis K; Gartaganis PS; Totou S; Vasilopoulou MG; Patelis A; Giannakis I; Chalkiadaki E
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; ():11206721211069227. PubMed ID: 34955039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.
Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters.
Bao F; Huang Z; Huang J; Wang J; Deng M; Li L; Yu A; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients With Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification.
Kiddee W; Tanjana A
J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr; 30(4):317-324. PubMed ID: 33137014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Latanoprost treatment differentially affects intraocular pressure readings obtained with three different tonometers.
Sánchez-Barahona C; Bolívar G; Katsanos A; Teus MA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1112-e1115. PubMed ID: 31184426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta A; Elsheikh A; Khabazkhoob M; Ambrósio R; Maddah N; Danesh Z
Clin Optom (Auckl); 2019; 11():127-133. PubMed ID: 31802962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
