182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35310278)
1. Difficulties Experienced by Older Listeners in Utilizing Voice Cues for Speaker Discrimination.
Zaltz Y; Kishon-Rabin L
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():797422. PubMed ID: 35310278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination.
Zaltz Y; Goldsworthy RL; Eisenberg LS; Kishon-Rabin L
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):182-193. PubMed ID: 31107364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discrimination of Voice Pitch and Vocal-Tract Length in Cochlear Implant Users.
Gaudrain E; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):226-237. PubMed ID: 28799983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.
Schvartz KC; Chatterjee M
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 22237163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.
Souza P; Arehart K; Miller CW; Muralimanohar RK
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20739892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre and Fundamental Frequency Cues to the Perception of Voice Gender and Age in Cochlear Implant Users.
Skuk VG; Kirchen L; Oberhoffner T; Guntinas-Lichius O; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 63(9):3155-3175. PubMed ID: 32881631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Use of Voice Cues for Speaker Gender Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Meister H; Fürsen K; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R; Walger M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):546-56. PubMed ID: 27135985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fundamental-frequency discrimination using noise-band-vocoded harmonic complexes in older listeners with normal hearing.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Chatterjee M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1687-95. PubMed ID: 26428806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic cues for the recognition of self-voice and other-voice.
Xu M; Homae F; Hashimoto R; Hagiwara H
Front Psychol; 2013; 4():735. PubMed ID: 24133475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influences of fundamental frequency, formant frequencies, aperiodicity, and spectrum level on the perception of voice gender.
Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):285-96. PubMed ID: 23882002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vocal Age Disguise: The Role of Fundamental Frequency and Speech Rate and Its Perceived Effects.
Skoog Waller S; Eriksson M
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1814. PubMed ID: 27917144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.
Fuller CD; Gaudrain E; Clarke JN; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Free RH; Başkent D
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):1037-48. PubMed ID: 25172111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
