315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3531051)
1. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold caliper measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue.
Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M
Int J Obes; 1986; 10(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 3531051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound as an approach to assessing body composition.
Fanelli MT; Kuczmarski RJ
Am J Clin Nutr; 1984 May; 39(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 6711473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold measurements in assessment of subcutaneous and total fatness.
Borkan GA; Hults DE; Cardarelli J; Burrows BA
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1982 Jul; 58(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 7124924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonic and skinfold caliper measures of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in elderly men and women.
Chumlea WC; Roche AF
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Nov; 71(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 3544855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skinfold caliper and ultrasound assessments of change in the distribution of subcutaneous fat during adolescent pregnancy.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Barrett J; Stamm E
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1340-5. PubMed ID: 11571597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasonic assessment of body composition in obese adults: overcoming the limitations of the skinfold caliper.
Kuczmarski RJ; Fanelli MT; Koch GG
Am J Clin Nutr; 1987 Apr; 45(4):717-24. PubMed ID: 3565298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of body fat from ultrasound measures of subcutaneous fat and circumferences in obese women.
Fanelli MT; Kuczmarski RJ; Hirsch M
Int J Obes; 1988; 12(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 3290131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of near infra-red interactance for assessment of subcutaneous and total body fat.
Brooke-Wavell K; Jones PR; Norgan NG; Hardman AE
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1995 Jan; 49(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 7713052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
Müller W; Horn M; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Kainz P; Kröpfl JM; Maughan RJ; Ahammer H
Br J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 47(16):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24055780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of body fat by skinfold caliper: assumptions and cadaver evidence.
Martin AD; Ross WD; Drinkwater DT; Clarys JP
Int J Obes; 1985; 9 Suppl 1():31-9. PubMed ID: 4066123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography.
Orphanidou C; McCargar L; Birmingham CL; Mathieson J; Goldner E
J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Aug; 94(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 8046177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suprailiac or abdominal skinfold thickness measured with a skinfold caliper as a predictor of body density in Japanese adults.
Demura S; Sato S
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2007 Sep; 213(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 17785953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodological factors and the prediction of body fat in female athletes.
Lohman TG; Pollock ML; Slaughter MH; Brandon LJ; Boileau RA
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1984; 16(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 6708788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of subcutaneous fat thickness with high frequency pulsed ultrasound: comparisons with a caliper and a radiographic technique.
Black D; Vora J; Hayward M; Marks R
Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988 Feb; 9(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 3282753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in man.
Jones PR; Davies PS; Norgan NG
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Nov; 71(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 3544856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Body fat in adult man: semicentenary of fat density and skinfolds.
Fidanza F
Acta Diabetol; 2003 Oct; 40 Suppl 1():S242-5. PubMed ID: 14618483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Proposed equations for predicting the amount of body fat in young adults].
Guedes DP; Guedes JE
Semina; 1991 Jun; 12(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 1845307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of four techniques for measuring central adiposity in postpartum adolescents.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Stamm E; Scherzinger A
J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11444792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of skinfold calipers as a tool for measuring body fat in human beings.
Walia BN; Bhalla AK; Suri S
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Aug; 96():255-7. PubMed ID: 1428065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a portable ultrasonoscope in assessing the body composition of college-age women.
Volz PA; Ostrove SM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1984; 16(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 6708789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
