These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35310956)

  • 1. Comparison of Structural Parsers and Neural Language Models as Surprisal Estimators.
    Oh BD; Clark C; Schuler W
    Front Artif Intell; 2022; 5():777963. PubMed ID: 35310956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Surprisal and Locality on Danish Sentence Processing: An Eye-Tracking Investigation.
    Balling LW; Kizach J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1119-1136. PubMed ID: 28332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of Expectation and Working Memory Constraints in Hindi Comprehension: An Eye-tracking Corpus Analysis.
    Agrawal A; Agarwal S; Husain S
    J Eye Mov Res; 2017 Apr; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 33828649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
    Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty and Expectation in Sentence Processing: Evidence From Subcategorization Distributions.
    Linzen T; Jaeger TF
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 40(6):1382-411. PubMed ID: 26286681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dependency Resolution Difficulty Increases with Distance in Persian Separable Complex Predicates: Evidence for Expectation and Memory-Based Accounts.
    Safavi MS; Husain S; Vasishth S
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():403. PubMed ID: 27064660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading.
    Henderson JM; Choi W; Lowder MW; Ferreira F
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():293-300. PubMed ID: 26908322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty.
    van Schijndel M; Linzen T
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12988. PubMed ID: 34170031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurobehavioral Correlates of Surprisal in Language Comprehension: A Neurocomputational Model.
    Brouwer H; Delogu F; Venhuizen NJ; Crocker MW
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():615538. PubMed ID: 33643143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lossy-Context Surprisal: An Information-Theoretic Model of Memory Effects in Sentence Processing.
    Futrell R; Gibson E; Levy RP
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Mar; 44(3):e12814. PubMed ID: 32100918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction at the intersection of sentence context and word form: Evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading.
    Amenta S; Hasenäcker J; Crepaldi D; Marelli M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Jun; 30(3):1081-1092. PubMed ID: 36510092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surprisal From Language Models Can Predict ERPs in Processing Predicate-Argument Structures Only if Enriched by an Agent Preference Principle.
    Huber E; Sauppe S; Isasi-Isasmendi A; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Merlo P; Bickel B
    Neurobiol Lang (Camb); 2024; 5(1):167-200. PubMed ID: 38645615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension.
    Brothers T; Kuperberg GR
    J Mem Lang; 2021 Feb; 116():. PubMed ID: 33100508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Locality and expectation effects in Hindi preverbal constituent ordering.
    Ranjan S; Rajkumar R; Agarwal S
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():104959. PubMed ID: 35091261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Visual Uncertainty on Word Surprisal and Processing Effort.
    Ankener CS; Sekicki M; Staudte M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2387. PubMed ID: 30618905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic.
    Smith NJ; Levy R
    Cognition; 2013 Sep; 128(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 23747651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Plausibility of Sampling as an Algorithmic Theory of Sentence Processing.
    Hoover JL; Sonderegger M; Piantadosi ST; O'Donnell TJ
    Open Mind (Camb); 2023; 7():350-391. PubMed ID: 37637302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncertainty reduction as a measure of cognitive load in sentence comprehension.
    Frank SL
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 5(3):475-94. PubMed ID: 23681508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantics-weighted lexical surprisal modeling of naturalistic functional MRI time-series during spoken narrative listening.
    Russo AG; De Martino M; Mancuso A; Iaconetta G; Manara R; Elia A; Laudanna A; Di Salle F; Esposito F
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 222():117281. PubMed ID: 32828929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surprisal modulates dual-task performance in older adults: Pupillometry shows age-related trade-offs in task performance and time-course of language processing.
    Häuser KI; Demberg V; Kray J
    Psychol Aging; 2018 Dec; 33(8):1168-1180. PubMed ID: 30550333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.