These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35311426)

  • 1. An effective method to summarise the outcomes of questionnaire-based studies in systematic reviews.
    Tewari N; Goel S; Haldar P; Mathur VP; Srivastav S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2022 Nov; 80(8):569-572. PubMed ID: 35311426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological steps used by authors of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials: a cross-sectional study.
    Giang HTN; Ahmed AM; Fala RY; Khattab MM; Othman MHA; Abdelrahman SAM; Thao LP; Gabl AEAE; Elrashedy SA; Lee PN; Hirayama K; Salem H; Huy NT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):164. PubMed ID: 31349805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key Steps in Conducting Systematic Reviews for Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines: Methodology of the European Association of Urology.
    Knoll T; Omar MI; Maclennan S; Hernández V; Canfield S; Yuan Y; Bruins M; Marconi L; Van Poppel H; N'Dow J; Sylvester R;
    Eur Urol; 2018 Feb; 73(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 28917594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deprescribing medicines in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: the TAILOR evidence synthesis.
    Reeve J; Maden M; Hill R; Turk A; Mahtani K; Wong G; Lasserson D; Krska J; Mangin D; Byng R; Wallace E; Ranson E
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 Jul; 26(32):1-148. PubMed ID: 35894932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2-risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence.
    Lunny C; Brennan SE; McDonald S; McKenzie JE
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):159. PubMed ID: 30314530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informant-based screening tools for diagnosis of dementia, an overview of systematic reviews of test accuracy studies protocol.
    Taylor-Rowan M; Nafisi S; Patel A; Burton JK; Quinn TJ
    Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):271. PubMed ID: 33243282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Considerations for systematic reviews of quantitative surveys: Learnings from a systematic review of the Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire.
    Weir KR; Ailabouni NJ; Schneider CR; Hilmer SN; Reeve E
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2022 Feb; 18(2):2345-2349. PubMed ID: 34340909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interventions during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Medley N; Vogel JP; Care A; Alfirevic Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 11(11):CD012505. PubMed ID: 30480756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
    Leaviss J; Davis S; Ren S; Hamilton J; Scope A; Booth A; Sutton A; Parry G; Buszewicz M; Moss-Morris R; White P
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Sep; 24(46):1-490. PubMed ID: 32975190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol.
    Korevaar E; Karahalios A; Forbes AB; Turner SL; McDonald S; Taljaard M; Grimshaw JM; Cheng AC; Bero L; McKenzie JE
    F1000Res; 2020; 9():110. PubMed ID: 33163155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Massage therapy in infants and children under 5 years of age: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.
    Chen SC; Yu J; Yuen SC; Lam JC; Suen LK; Yeung WF
    Syst Rev; 2021 Apr; 10(1):127. PubMed ID: 33910623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
    Swierz MJ; Storman D; Zajac J; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 34837960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.
    Anglemyer A; Horvath HT; Bero L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Apr; 2014(4):MR000034. PubMed ID: 24782322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers.
    Tawfik GM; Giang HTN; Ghozy S; Altibi AM; Kandil H; Le HH; Eid PS; Radwan I; Makram OM; Hien TTT; Sherif M; Hossain AS; Thang TLL; Puljak L; Salem H; Numair T; Moji K; Huy NT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):213. PubMed ID: 32842968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of 'PICO for synthesis' and methods for synthesis without meta-analysis: protocol for a survey of current practice in systematic reviews of health interventions.
    Cumpston MS; McKenzie JE; Thomas J; Brennan SE
    F1000Res; 2020; 9():678. PubMed ID: 33728041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
    Ho L; Ke FYT; Wong CHL; Wu IXY; Cheung AKL; Mao C; Chung VCH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):237. PubMed ID: 34717563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in meta-analysis: a protocol for a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews.
    Devji T; Johnston BC; Patrick DL; Bhandari M; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e017138. PubMed ID: 28963296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heterogeneity of studies in anesthesiology systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological review and proposal for evidence mapping.
    Umberham B; Hedin R; Detweiler B; Kollmorgen L; Hicks C; Vassar M
    Br J Anaesth; 2017 Nov; 119(5):874-884. PubMed ID: 29029012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.