These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35311899)

  • 1. Modulation in alpha band activity reflects syntax composition: an MEG study of minimal syntactic binding.
    Hardy SM; Jensen O; Wheeldon L; Mazaheri A; Segaert K
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Jan; 33(3):497-511. PubMed ID: 35311899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binding language: structuring sentences through precisely timed oscillatory mechanisms.
    Segaert K; Mazaheri A; Hagoort P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(7):2651-2662. PubMed ID: 29283204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG.
    Kielar A; Panamsky L; Links KA; Meltzer JA
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 105():507-24. PubMed ID: 25463470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional reorganization of language networks for semantics and syntax in chronic stroke: Evidence from MEG.
    Kielar A; Deschamps T; Jokel R; Meltzer JA
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Aug; 37(8):2869-93. PubMed ID: 27091757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lists with and without Syntax: A New Approach to Measuring the Neural Processing of Syntax.
    Law R; Pylkkänen L
    J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 41(10):2186-2196. PubMed ID: 33500276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic and syntactic composition of minimal adjective-noun phrases in Dutch: An MEG study.
    Kochari AR; Lewis AG; Schoffelen JM; Schriefers H
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 May; 155():107754. PubMed ID: 33476626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left posterior temporal cortex is sensitive to syntax within conceptually matched Arabic expressions.
    Matar S; Dirani J; Marantz A; Pylkkänen L
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):7181. PubMed ID: 33785801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Isolating syntax in natural language: MEG evidence for an early contribution of left posterior temporal cortex.
    Flick G; Pylkkänen L
    Cortex; 2020 Jun; 127():42-57. PubMed ID: 32160572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A role for left inferior frontal and posterior superior temporal cortex in extracting a syntactic tree from a sentence.
    Pattamadilok C; Dehaene S; Pallier C
    Cortex; 2016 Feb; 75():44-55. PubMed ID: 26709465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contributions of left frontal and temporal cortex to sentence comprehension: Evidence from simultaneous TMS-EEG.
    Kroczek LOH; Gunter TC; Rysop AU; Friederici AD; Hartwigsen G
    Cortex; 2019 Jun; 115():86-98. PubMed ID: 30776735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of semantic-driven syntactic parsing in sentence comprehension.
    Zhang Y; Taft M; Tang J; Li L
    Neuroimage; 2024 Apr; 289():120543. PubMed ID: 38369168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MEG Evidence for Incremental Sentence Composition in the Anterior Temporal Lobe.
    Brennan JR; Pylkkänen L
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1515-1531. PubMed ID: 27813182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a selective left-hemispheric fronto-temporal network for processing syntactic complexity in language comprehension.
    Xiao Y; Friederici AD; Margulies DS; Brauer J
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Mar; 83():274-282. PubMed ID: 26352468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How the conceptual specificity of individual words affects incremental sentence composition: MEG evidence.
    Kim S; Pylkkänen L
    Brain Lang; 2021 Jul; 218():104951. PubMed ID: 33894598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.
    Krause CD; Fengler A; Pino D; Sehm B; Friederici AD; Obrig H
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Feb; 180():108465. PubMed ID: 36586718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The neural basis of combinatory syntax and semantics.
    Pylkkänen L
    Science; 2019 Oct; 366(6461):62-66. PubMed ID: 31604303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The temporal dynamics of structure and content in sentence comprehension: Evidence from fMRI-constrained MEG.
    Matchin W; Brodbeck C; Hammerly C; Lau E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Feb; 40(2):663-678. PubMed ID: 30259599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Late dominance of the right hemisphere during narrative comprehension.
    Youssofzadeh V; Conant L; Stout J; Ustine C; Humphries C; Gross WL; Shah-Basak P; Mathis J; Awe E; Allen L; DeYoe EA; Carlson C; Anderson CT; Maganti R; Hermann B; Nair VA; Prabhakaran V; Meyerand B; Binder JR; Raghavan M
    Neuroimage; 2022 Dec; 264():119749. PubMed ID: 36379420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of the IFG and pSTS in syntactic prediction: Evidence from a parametric study of hierarchical structure in fMRI.
    Matchin W; Hammerly C; Lau E
    Cortex; 2017 Mar; 88():106-123. PubMed ID: 28088041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cortical dynamics in building syntactic structures of sentences: an MEG study in a minimal-pair paradigm.
    Iijima K; Fukui N; Sakai KL
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(4):1387-96. PubMed ID: 19041723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.