142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35312664)
1. Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory Testing.
Demir Çuha M; Özdemir A; Evren K; Can B; Doyuk Z; Yiş R; Başbulut E; Us E; Kalem F; Appak Ö; Berkem R; Sönmez C; Zarakolu P; Saribaş Z; Şener B
Sex Transm Dis; 2022 Jun; 49(6):453-457. PubMed ID: 35312664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening].
Ozbek OA; Doğan Y
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing.
Fakile YF; Jost H; Hoover KW; Gustafson KJ; Novak-Weekley SM; Schapiro JM; Tran A; Chow JM; Park IU
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement of reverse sequence algorithm for syphilis diagnosis using optimal treponemal screening assay signal-to-cutoff ratio.
Serhir B; Labbé AC; Doualla-Bell F; Simard M; Lambert G; Trudelle A; Longtin J; Tremblay C; Fortin C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204001. PubMed ID: 30212544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consistency Between Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination Assay and Architect Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay and Characterization of Inconsistent Samples.
Zhiyan L; Meiling W; Ping L; Jinhua D; Zhenlin Y; Zhenru F
J Clin Lab Anal; 2015 Jul; 29(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 24840601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved reverse screening algorithm for Treponema pallidum antibody using signal-to-cutoff ratios from chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay.
Dai S; Chi P; Lin Y; Zheng X; Liu W; Zhang J; Zeng Q; Wu X; Liu W; Wang J
Sex Transm Dis; 2014 Jan; 41(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 24326578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a new competitive immunoassay (BioElisa Syphilis) for screening for Treponema pallidum antibodies at various stages of syphilis.
Ebel A; Bachelart L; Alonso JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 36(2):358-61. PubMed ID: 9466741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the Second Treponemal Test Necessary in the Reverse Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Syphilis?
Yürüyen C; Aksaray S
Clin Lab; 2020 Jun; 66(6):. PubMed ID: 32538043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for antibodies against Treponema pallidum with chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay: analysis of discordant serology results and clinical characterization.
Li Z; Feng Z; Liu P; Yan C
Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Sep; 53(Pt 5):588-92. PubMed ID: 26680646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the equivocal test results of Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay.
Su SJ; Huang S; Chung CY; Yang HM; Chow YO
J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 43(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 2180985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of diagnostic serological results in cases of suspected primary syphilis infection.
Gratzer B; Pohl D; Hotton AL
Sex Transm Dis; 2014 May; 41(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 24722379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the serodia Treponema pallidum particle agglutination, the Murex Syphilis ICE and the Enzywell TP tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis.
Aktas G; Young H; Moyes A; Badur S
Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Apr; 16(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 15899082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enzyme immunoassay for anti-treponemal IgG: screening or confirmatory test?
Young H; Moyes A; McMillan A; Patterson J
J Clin Pathol; 1992 Jan; 45(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 1740512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Syphilis detection: evaluation of serological screening and pilot reverse confirmatory assay algorithm in blood donors.
Sommese L; Paolillo R; Sabia C; Costa D; De Pascale MR; Iannone C; Esposito A; Schiano C; Napoli C
Int J STD AIDS; 2016 Jul; 27(8):644-9. PubMed ID: 26068964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of the Treponema pallidum CAPTIA syphilis-G enzyme immunoassay with the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption immunoglobulin G assay for syphilis testing.
Halling VW; Jones MF; Bestrom JE; Wold AD; Rosenblatt JE; Smith TF; Cockerill FR
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Oct; 37(10):3233-4. PubMed ID: 10488183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the rapid plasma reagin "teardrop" card test for screening of syphilis in field conditions.
Van Dyck E; Van de Velden L; Ndoye I; Piot P; Meheus A
Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 8211535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of different confirmatory algorithms using seven treponemal tests on Architect Syphilis TP-positive/RPR-negative sera.
Jonckheere S; Berth M; Van Esbroeck M; Blomme S; Lagrou K; Padalko E
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2041-8. PubMed ID: 26187433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of automated architect syphilis TP as a diagnostic laboratory screening test for syphilis].
Kim J; Kim WH; Cho C; Kim J; Kim GY; Nam MH; Kim JS; Bae SY; Cho Y
Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Dec; 28(6):475-82. PubMed ID: 19127113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison and evaluation of Abbott chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay and ChIVD light-initiated chemiluminescent assay in the detection of Treponema pallidum antibody.
Chen X; Yang R; Liang Y; Yuan T; Zhou J; Wang T; Cui L
J Clin Lab Anal; 2020 Jul; 34(7):e23275. PubMed ID: 32133697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Markers of past syphilis in HIV infection comparing Captia Syphilis G anti-treponemal IgG enzyme immunoassay with other treponemal antigen tests.
Young H; Moyes A; Ross JD
Int J STD AIDS; 1995; 6(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 7779920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
