These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35312664)

  • 41. Comparison of Traditional and Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithms in Medical Health Checkups.
    Nah EH; Cho S; Kim S; Cho HI; Chai JY
    Ann Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 37(6):511-515. PubMed ID: 28840989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Understanding Utilization and Seroprevalence of Syphilis Tests in Local Clinics and Hospitals in Korea.
    Choi R; Lee SG; Lee EH
    Clin Lab; 2023 Jan; 69(1):. PubMed ID: 36649527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Treponema pallidum haemagglutination (TPHA) test in biological false positive and leprosy sera.
    Garner MF; Backhouse JL; Daskalopoulos G; Walsh JL
    J Clin Pathol; 1973 Apr; 26(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 4573788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The diagnostic value and performance evaluation of five serological tests for the detection of Treponema pallidum.
    Liu C; Ou Q; Chen H; Chen J; Lin S; Jiang L; Yang B
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2014 May; 28(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 24478062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparative evaluation of three different treponemal enzyme immunoassays for syphilis.
    Viriyataveekul R; Laodee N; Potprasat S; Piyophirapong S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jun; 89(6):773-9. PubMed ID: 16850676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Evaluation of performance and false positivity of Mediace RPR test that uses a chemistry autoanalyzer].
    Noh J; Ko HH; Yun Y; Choi YS; Lee SG; Shin S; Han KS; Song EY
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Aug; 28(4):312-8. PubMed ID: 18728382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Syphilis in pregnant women in Mozambique.
    Liljestrand J; Bergström S; Nieuwenhuis F; Hederstedt B
    Genitourin Med; 1985 Dec; 61(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 3910543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Using Treponemal Assay Signal Strength Cutoff Ratios To Predict Syphilis Infection.
    Bristow CC; Klausner JD
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the reverse algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis.
    Lee S; Yu HJ; Lim S; Park H; Kwon MJ; Woo HY
    Int J Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 80():98-104. PubMed ID: 30634041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Screening for treponemal infection by a new enzyme immunoassay.
    Young H; Moyes A; McMillan A; Robertson DH
    Genitourin Med; 1989 Apr; 65(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 2666302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison between the automated reagin test and reagin screen test methods of VDRL screening tests for syphilis in use in a routine laboratory.
    Simon RD; Peacock AM
    J Clin Pathol; 1977 Jul; 30(7):626-9. PubMed ID: 328538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay technique for detection of antibodies against Treponema pallidum.
    Castro R; Prieto ES; Santo I; Azevedo J; Exposto Fda L
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 41(1):250-3. PubMed ID: 12517856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analysis of 2 Reverse Syphilis Testing Algorithms in Diagnosis of Syphilis: A Large-Cohort Prospective Study.
    Peng J; Lu Y; Yu H; Wu S; Li T; Li H; Deng L; Sun Z
    Clin Infect Dis; 2018 Aug; 67(6):947-953. PubMed ID: 30059969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Syphilis diagnosis: screening by enzyme immunoassay and variation in fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) confirmatory test performance.
    Chronas G; Moyes A; Young H
    Med Lab Sci; 1992 Mar; 49(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 1453909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Recent Advances in Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis].
    Zarakolu P
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2023 Jan; 57(1):141-155. PubMed ID: 36636853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Use of the INNO-LIA syphilis score assay in the resolution of discordant positive screening enzyme immunoassay results for the serological diagnosis of syphilis.
    Lam TK; Lau HY; Lee YP; Fung SM; Leung WL; Kam KM
    Int J STD AIDS; 2014 Jan; 25(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 23970631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Performance of Treponemal Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis.
    Park IU; Fakile YF; Chow JM; Gustafson KJ; Jost H; Schapiro JM; Novak-Weekley S; Tran A; Nomura JH; Chen V; Beheshti M; Tsai T; Hoover K; Bolan G
    Clin Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 68(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29986091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analytical evaluation of nine serological assays for diagnosis of syphilis.
    Malm K; Andersson S; Fredlund H; Norrgren H; Biague A; Månsson F; Ballard R; Unemo M
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2369-76. PubMed ID: 26370737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of an automated rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test with the conventional RPR card test in syphilis testing.
    Lee JH; Lim CS; Lee MG; Kim HS
    BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e005664. PubMed ID: 25552608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Use of Treponemal Screening Assay Strength of Signal to Avoid Unnecessary Confirmatory Testing.
    Berry GJ; Loeffelholz MJ
    Sex Transm Dis; 2016 Dec; 43(12):737-740. PubMed ID: 27835625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.