51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35312712)
1. Comparison of Three Different DNA Extraction Methods for
Eslami G; Khalatbari-Limaki S; Ehrampoush MH; Gholamrezaei M; Hajimohammadi B; Oryan A
Iran J Parasitol; 2017; 12(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 28761484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of different laboratory techniques for guanidinium-phenol-chloroform RNA extraction on A260/A280 and on accuracy of mRNA quantitation by reverse transcriptase-PCR.
Yamaguchi M; Dieffenbach CW; Connolly R; Cruess DF; Baur W; Sharefkin JB
PCR Methods Appl; 1992 May; 1(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 1282433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of DeNovix, NanoDrop and Qubit for DNA quantification and impurity detection of bacterial DNA extracts.
Versmessen N; Van Simaey L; Negash AA; Vandekerckhove M; Hulpiau P; Vaneechoutte M; Cools P
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0305650. PubMed ID: 38885212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing recovery rates of distinct exogenous controls for gDNA extraction efficiency using phenol-chloroform or silica-column based extractions.
Lima Â; Sousa LGV; Macedo F; Muzny CA; Cerca N
J Microbiol Methods; 2022 Dec; 203():106607. PubMed ID: 36343770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A modified CTAB method for the extraction of high-quality RNA from mono-and dicotyledonous plants rich in secondary metabolites.
Kiss T; Karácsony Z; Gomba-Tóth A; Szabadi KL; Spitzmüller Z; Hegyi-Kaló J; Cels T; Otto M; Golen R; Hegyi ÁI; Geml J; Váczy KZ
Plant Methods; 2024 May; 20(1):62. PubMed ID: 38704591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An innovative optimized protocol for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from recalcitrant Shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa, C.F. Gaertn) plant and its suitability for downstream applications.
Attikora AJP; Silué S; Yao SDM; De Clerck C; Shumbe L; Diarrassouba N; Fofana IJ; Alabi T; Lassois L
Mol Biol Rep; 2024 Jan; 51(1):171. PubMed ID: 38252378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An optimal genomic DNA extraction method for shoots of four
Ma Y; Li B; Yang D; Wang S; Yu L; Zhan H; Li J
Biotechniques; 2024 Mar; 76(3):94-103. PubMed ID: 38131324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole genome sequencing of marine organisms by Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Assessment and optimization of HMW-DNA extraction protocols.
Boughattas S; Albatesh D; Al-Khater A; Giraldes BW; Althani AA; Benslimane FM
Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 11(24):18505-18513. PubMed ID: 35003688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liquid-nitrogen-free CTAB DNA extraction method from silica-dried specimens for next-generation sequencing and assembly.
Quiñones KJO; Gentallan RP; Timog EBS; Cruz JRAV; Macabecha CGA; Papa IA; Coronado NB; Bartolome MCB; Ceribo DB; Madayag RE; Magtoltol JB; Sienes RKA; Alvaran BBS; Borromeo TH
MethodsX; 2024 Jun; 12():102758. PubMed ID: 38883586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The assessment of DNA from marine organisms via a modified salting-out protocol.
Ferrara GB; Murgia B; Parodi AM; Valisano L; Cerrano C; Palmisano G; Bavestrello G; Sara M
Cell Mol Biol Lett; 2006; 11(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 16847562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of morphological changes and DNA quantification: An in vitro study on acid-immersed teeth.
Sowmya K; Sudheendra U; Khan S; Nagpal N; Prathamesh S
J Forensic Dent Sci; 2013 Jan; 5(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 23960414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. OpenCell: A Low-cost, Open-Source, 3-in-1 device for DNA Extraction.
Gupta A; Yu J; Challita EJ; Standeven J; Bhamla MS
bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 37808818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expression of BSN314 lysozyme genes in Escherichia coli BL21: a study to demonstrate microbicidal and disintegarting potential of the cloned lysozyme.
Naveed M; Wen S; Chan MWH; Wang F; Aslam S; Yin X; Xu B; Ullah A
Braz J Microbiol; 2024 Mar; 55(1):215-233. PubMed ID: 38146050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction: Comparison of six methods for Loa loa genomic DNA extraction.
PLOS ONE Editors
PLoS One; 2023; 18(9):e0291986. PubMed ID: 37725626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of six methods for Loa loa genomic DNA extraction.
Dieki R; Eyang-Assengone ER; Makouloutou-Nzassi P; Bangueboussa F; Nsi Emvo E; Akue JP
PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0265582. PubMed ID: 35312712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Qualification study of two genomic DNA extraction methods in different clinical samples.
Javadi A; Shamaei M; Mohammadi Ziazi L; Pourabdollah M; Dorudinia A; Seyedmehdi SM; Karimi S
Tanaffos; 2014; 13(4):41-7. PubMed ID: 25852760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative evaluation of four DNA extraction protocols from whole blood sample.
Ghaheri M; Kahrizi D; Yari K; Babaie A; Suthar RS; Kazemi E
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2016 Mar; 62(3):120-4. PubMed ID: 27064884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating genomic DNA extraction methods from human whole blood using endpoint and real-time PCR assays.
Koshy L; Anju AL; Harikrishnan S; Kutty VR; Jissa VT; Kurikesu I; Jayachandran P; Jayakumaran Nair A; Gangaprasad A; Nair GM; Sudhakaran PR
Mol Biol Rep; 2017 Feb; 44(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 27686559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust comparative performance of genomic DNA extraction methods from non-engorged phlebotomine sandflies.
Senne NA; Santos HA; Araújo TR; Paulino PG; Mendonça LP; Moreira HVS; Camilo TA; da Costa Angelo I
Med Vet Entomol; 2022 Jun; 36(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 35229900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
