These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3531278)

  • 1. Attenuation measurement uncertainties caused by speckle statistics.
    Parker KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Sep; 80(3):727-34. PubMed ID: 3531278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-dependent attenuation-compensation functions for ultrasonic signals backscattered from random media.
    Oelze ML; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 May; 111(5 Pt 1):2308-19. PubMed ID: 12051451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On estimating the number density of random scatterers from backscattered acoustic signals.
    Sleefe GE; Lele PP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(8):709-27. PubMed ID: 3062865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of stochastic analysis to ultrasonic echoes--estimation of attenuation and tissue heterogeneity from peaks of echo envelope.
    He P; Greenleaf JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):526-34. PubMed ID: 3512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deviations from Rayleigh statistics in ultrasonic speckle.
    Tuthill TA; Sperry RH; Parker KJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Apr; 10(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 3057714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time domain attenuation estimation method from ultrasonic backscattered signals.
    Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):533-43. PubMed ID: 22779499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonic attenuation and absorption in liver tissue.
    Parker KJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; 9(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 6649154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo measurement of attenuation.
    Ferrari L; Jones JP; Gonzalez VM
    Ultrasonics; 1986 Mar; 24(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 3952885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametric vs nonparametric measurements in tissues with nonlinear frequency dependent attenuation.
    Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1984; 10(6):709-13. PubMed ID: 6399167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of heat conduction and sample size on ultrasonic absorption measurements.
    Parker KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):719-25. PubMed ID: 3973241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the spatial autocorrelation function for ultrasound scatterers in isotropic media.
    Chen JF; Zagzebski JA; Dong F; Madsen EL
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 9608474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mean-scatterer spacing estimates with spectral correlation.
    Varghese T; Donohue KD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Dec; 96(6):3504-15. PubMed ID: 7814765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attenuation of ultrasound: magnitude and frequency dependence for tissue characterization.
    Parker KJ; Lerner RM; Waag RC
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 6387795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of a system for ultrasonic imaging of attenuation and texture in soft tissue.
    Salomonsson G; Löfström B
    Ultrason Imaging; 1985 Jul; 7(3):225-43. PubMed ID: 3913098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tissue Attenuation Estimation by Mean Frequency Downshift and Bandwidth Limitation.
    Klimonda Z; Postema M; Nowicki A; Litniewski J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Aug; 63(8):1107-15. PubMed ID: 27254862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of angular and frequency compounding in ultrasonic attenuation estimations.
    Tu H; Zagzebski JA; Gerig AL; Chen Q; Madsen EL; Hall TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3307-18. PubMed ID: 15957797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The propagation of Gaussian modulated pulses in dissipative and/or dispersive media such as tissue.
    Ferrari L; Jones JP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 4035806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo and in vitro ultrasound beam distortion measurements of a large aperture and a conventional aperture focussed transducer.
    Moshfeghi M; Waag RC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(5):415-28. PubMed ID: 3051615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency domain processing for ultrasonic attenuation measurement in liver.
    Wilson LS; Robinson DE; Doust BD
    Ultrason Imaging; 1984 Jul; 6(3):278-92. PubMed ID: 6396922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of tissue anisotropy on the spectral characteristics of ultrasonic backscatter measured with a clinical imaging system.
    Holland MR; Lewis SH; Hall CS; Finch-Johnston AE; Handley SM; Wallace KD; D'sa AP; Prater DM; Perez JE; Miller JG
    Ultrason Imaging; 1998 Jul; 20(3):178-90. PubMed ID: 9921618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.