These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35312804)
1. Sacrocolpopexy experience with a novel robotic surgical platform. Sassani JC; Glass Clark S; McGough CE; Shepherd JP; Bonidie M Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3255-3260. PubMed ID: 35312804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy. Oh S; Yi J; Song AY; Jee J; Bae N; Shin JH Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 38900162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of two robotic platforms. Glass Clark S; Shepherd JP; Sassani JC; Bonidie M Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 36282303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse. Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Operative Time for Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: Comparison of Conventional Laparoscopy versus Robotic Platform. Glass Clark S; Melnyk AI; Bonidie M; Giugale L; Bradley MS J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):1063-1067. PubMed ID: 35605827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning curves and perioperative outcomes of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy on two different da Vinci Oh S; Bae N; Cho HW; Park YJ; Kim YJ; Shin JH J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 36757563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy. Ashmore S; Kenton K; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):260. PubMed ID: 38904835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy. Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with magnetic retraction: first experience using the SP da Vinci platform. Ganesan V; Goueli R; Rodriguez D; Hess D; Carmel M J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):753-758. PubMed ID: 32036495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Anand M; Woelk JL; Weaver AL; Trabuco EC; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1193-200. PubMed ID: 24715099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of fellowship surgical training on operative time and patient morbidity during robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Bonidie MJ; Shepherd JP Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1317-1323. PubMed ID: 28889173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and tips. Griebel L; Misal M; Cornella J; Khan A; Wolter C; Yi J Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2905. PubMed ID: 35333928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy. Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial. Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system. Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Robotic-assisted surgery in urogynecology--our experience with the first 100 cases: experience from a single institution]. Mustafa S; Mustafa M; Burke Y; Nibal AK; Deutsch M; Deutsch M; Lowenstein L Harefuah; 2014 Aug; 153(8):448-52, 499. PubMed ID: 25286633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]