304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35313026)
1. Accuracy of Dental and Industrial 3D Printers.
Anadioti E; Kane B; Zhang Y; Bergler M; Mante F; Blatz MB
J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):30-37. PubMed ID: 35313026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.
Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers.
Morón-Conejo B; López-Vilagran J; Cáceres D; Berrendero S; Pradíes G
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2521-2532. PubMed ID: 36462040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer.
Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Akhlaghian M; Pardis S; Mir N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 31672421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
Emir F; Ayyildiz S
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology.
Hada T; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts.
Park JM; Jeon J; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 32958301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casting Patterns Fabricated Using Consumer 3D Printers.
Ishida Y; Miura D; Miyasaka T; Shinya A
Polymers (Basel); 2020 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 33003507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy, reproducibility, and dimensional stability of additively manufactured surgical templates.
Chen L; Lin WS; Polido WD; Eckert GJ; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 30948293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating and Comparing Flexure Strength of Dental Models Printed Using Fused Deposition Modelling, Digital Light Processing, and Stereolithography Apparatus Printers.
Atwal N; Bhatnagar D
Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54312. PubMed ID: 38496206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flexural Strength of 3D-Printing Resin Materials for Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Park SM; Park JM; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY
Materials (Basel); 2020 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 32911702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies.
Son K; Lee JH; Lee KB
Healthcare (Basel); 2021 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 34442120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of DLP and SLA printer technology on the accuracy of surgical guides for implant dentistry in free-end situations.
Le V; Keßler A; Folwaczny M
Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 36625374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influences of build angle on the accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of additively manufactured surgical templates.
Rubayo DD; Phasuk K; Vickery JM; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):658-663. PubMed ID: 33143902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Position Accuracy of Implant Analogs on 3D Printed Polymer versus Conventional Dental Stone Casts Measured Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.
Revilla-León M; Gonzalez-Martín Ó; Pérez López J; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Özcan M
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):560-567. PubMed ID: 29148121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the fit of surgical guides manufactured with low-cost 3D printers.
Bennett GW; Kim SK
Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 34978984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
