These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3531376)
1. In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. Plasmans PJ; Visseren LG; Vrijhoef MM; Kayser AF J Endod; 1986 Sep; 12(9):382-7. PubMed ID: 3531376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro comparison of two dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. Kern SB; von Fraunhofer JA; Mueninghoff LA J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Apr; 51(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 6374108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amalgam post and core: a simplified technique for endodontically-treated posterior teeth. Brown JW; McComb D Ont Dent; 1987 May; 64(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 3306539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Posts in molars. Must we? Gelfand M J Can Dent Assoc; 1986 May; 52(5):371-2. PubMed ID: 3516337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of various technics used in the reconstruction of dowels]. Pamplona Guisa JM; Ramirez Delgado RH Odontol Mexico; 1983 May; 1(2):7-17. PubMed ID: 6382087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Post and core buildup for endodontically treated posterior teeth. Podshadley AG J Ky Dent Assoc; 1981 Jan; 33(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 7017045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Amalgam build-up for endodontically treated posterior teeth with intraradicular extension]. Margelos J; Tripodakis AP Hell Stomatol Chron; 1990; 34(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 2130042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro comparison of retention between a hollow post and core and a solid post and core. Mosen PJ; Nicholls JI; Van Hassel HJ J Endod; 1984 Mar; 10(3):91-5. PubMed ID: 6371177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro comparison of retention between a hollow post and core and a custom hollow post and core. Halle EB; Nicholls JI; Van Hassel HJ J Endod; 1984 Mar; 10(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 6371178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting dowel (post) selection and use in endodontically treated teeth. Greenfeld RS; Marshall FJ J Can Dent Assoc; 1983 Nov; 49(11):777-83. PubMed ID: 6360314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Dowel and core systems for endodontically treated molars--in vitro loading]. Plasmans PJ; Welle PR; van't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1989 Jan; 96(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 2695847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A customized acrylic resin shell for fabricating an amalgam core on the coronally debilitated, endodontically treated posterior tooth. Bonilla ED; Anderkvist T; Miller GD Quintessence Int; 1995 May; 26(5):317-24. PubMed ID: 7568753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Post core restoration in endodontically treated posterior teeth. Christian GW; Button GL; Moon PC; England MC; Douglas HB J Endod; 1981 Apr; 7(4):182-5. PubMed ID: 7014754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Reconstruction of a dowel with a metal and amalgam root canal post]. Solimei GE Minerva Stomatol; 1985; 34(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 3887122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]