These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35313992)
1. Opportunities to improve the impact of two national clinical audit programmes: a theory-guided analysis. Willis TA; Wood S; Brehaut J; Colquhoun H; Brown B; Lorencatto F; Foy R Implement Sci Commun; 2022 Mar; 3(1):32. PubMed ID: 35313992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Embedded trials within national clinical audit programmes: A qualitative interview study of enablers and barriers. Alderson S; Willis TA; Wood S; Lorencatto F; Francis J; Ivers N; Grimshaw J; Foy R J Health Serv Res Policy; 2022 Jan; 27(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 34886697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Brown B; Gude WT; Blakeman T; van der Veer SN; Ivers N; Francis JJ; Lorencatto F; Presseau J; Peek N; Daker-White G Implement Sci; 2019 Apr; 14(1):40. PubMed ID: 31027495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeated analyses of national clinical audit reports demonstrate improvements in feedback methods. Khan T; Alderson S; Francis JJ; Lorencatto F; Grant-Casey J; Stanworth SJ; Foy R Implement Sci Commun; 2020 Nov; 1(1):106. PubMed ID: 33292847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Opportunities to enhance ward audit: a multi-site qualitative study. Sykes M; Thomson R; Kolehmainen N; Allan L; Finch T BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Mar; 21(1):226. PubMed ID: 33712006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theory-based and evidence-based design of audit and feedback programmes: examples from two clinical intervention studies. Hysong SJ; Kell HJ; Petersen LA; Campbell BA; Trautner BW BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):323-334. PubMed ID: 27288054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unpacking the intention to action gap: a qualitative study understanding how physicians engage with audit and feedback. Desveaux L; Ivers NM; Devotta K; Ramji N; Weyman K; Kiran T Implement Sci; 2021 Feb; 16(1):19. PubMed ID: 33596946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomised fractional factorial screening experiment to predict effective features of audit and feedback. Wright-Hughes A; Willis TA; Wilson S; Weller A; Lorencatto F; Althaf M; Seymour V; Farrin AJ; Francis J; Brehaut J; Ivers N; Alderson SL; Brown BC; Feltbower RG; Gale CP; Stanworth SJ; Hartley S; Colquhoun H; Presseau J; Walwyn R; Foy R Implement Sci; 2022 May; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 35619097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How well do critical care audit and feedback interventions adhere to best practice? Development and application of the REFLECT-52 evaluation tool. Foster M; Presseau J; Podolsky E; McIntyre L; Papoulias M; Brehaut JC Implement Sci; 2021 Aug; 16(1):81. PubMed ID: 34404449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia. Sykes M; Thomson R; Kolehmainen N; Allan L; Finch T Implement Sci; 2020 Jun; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 32552860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice: an intervention development protocol. Gould NJ; Lorencatto F; Stanworth SJ; Michie S; Prior ME; Glidewell L; Grimshaw JM; Francis JJ Implement Sci; 2014 Jul; 9():92. PubMed ID: 25070404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring variation in the use of feedback from national clinical audits: a realist investigation. Alvarado N; McVey L; Greenhalgh J; Dowding D; Mamas M; Gale C; Doherty P; Randell R BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Sep; 20(1):859. PubMed ID: 32917202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health professionals' perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of audit and feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based study in Dutch intensive care units. Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; Dongelmans DA; de Jonge E; Francis JJ; Peek N; de Keizer NF Implement Sci; 2018 Feb; 13(1):33. PubMed ID: 29454393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation. Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of theoretically informed audit and feedback: An exemplar from a complex implementation strategy to improve asthma self-management in UK primary care. McClatchey K; Sheldon A; Steed L; Sheringham J; Holmes S; Preston M; Appiagyei F; Price D; Taylor SJC; Pinnock H; J Eval Clin Pract; 2024 Feb; 30(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 37438918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhancing national audit through addressing the quality improvement capabilities of feedback recipients: a multi-phase intervention development study. Sykes M; O'Halloran E; Mahon L; McSharry J; Allan L; Thomson R; Finch T; Kolehmainen N Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2022 Jul; 8(1):143. PubMed ID: 35804468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing a questionnaire to evaluate an automated audit & feedback intervention: a Rand-modified Delphi method. Van den Wyngaert I; Van Pottelbergh G; Coteur K; Vaes B; Van den Bulck S BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Apr; 24(1):433. PubMed ID: 38581009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model depicting aspects of audit and feedback that impact physicians' acceptance of clinical performance feedback. Payne VL; Hysong SJ BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():260. PubMed ID: 27412170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar. Hijjeh M; Al Shaikh L; Alinier G; Selwood D; Malmstrom F; Hassan IF Qatar Med J; 2019; 2019(2):2. PubMed ID: 31763205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]