These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35313992)

  • 21. Delivering an iterative Communication Partner Training programme to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals: A pilot implementation study and process evaluation.
    Shrubsole K; Lin TJ; Burton C; Scott J; Finch E
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2021 May; 56(3):620-636. PubMed ID: 33818902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How is feedback from national clinical audits used? Views from English National Health Service trust audit leads.
    Taylor A; Neuburger J; Walker K; Cromwell D; Groene O
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2016 Apr; 21(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 26811374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
    Jamtvedt G; Young JM; Kristoffersen DT; O'Brien MA; Oxman AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Apr; (2):CD000259. PubMed ID: 16625533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finding the match between healthcare worker and expert for optimal audit and feedback on antimicrobial resistance prevention measures.
    Keizer J; Beerlage-De Jong N; Al Naiemi N; van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC
    Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2020 Aug; 9(1):125. PubMed ID: 32758300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of audit and feedback to support change behaviour in healthcare organisations - a cross-sectional qualitative study of primary care centre managers.
    Glenngård AH; Anell A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jul; 21(1):663. PubMed ID: 34229678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials.
    Hartley S; Foy R; Walwyn REA; Cicero R; Farrin AJ; Francis JJ; Lorencatto F; Gould NJ; Grant-Casey J; Grimshaw JM; Glidewell L; Michie S; Morris S; Stanworth SJ;
    Implement Sci; 2017 Jul; 12(1):84. PubMed ID: 28673310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors influencing the effectiveness of audit and feedback: nurses' perceptions.
    Christina V; Baldwin K; Biron A; Emed J; Lepage K
    J Nurs Manag; 2016 Nov; 24(8):1080-1087. PubMed ID: 27306646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A multidimensional approach to assessing intervention fidelity in a process evaluation of audit and feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions: a study protocol.
    Lorencatto F; Gould NJ; McIntyre SA; During C; Bird J; Walwyn R; Cicero R; Glidewell L; Hartley S; Stanworth SJ; Foy R; Grimshaw JM; Michie S; Francis JJ;
    Implement Sci; 2016 Dec; 11(1):163. PubMed ID: 27955683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Beyond quality improvement: exploring why primary care teams engage in a voluntary audit and feedback program.
    Wagner DJ; Durbin J; Barnsley J; Ivers NM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Dec; 17(1):803. PubMed ID: 29197382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Approaches to the organization of multi-practice audits in primary health care in the UK.
    Khunti K; Baker R; Rumsey M; Lakhani M
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Jun; 11(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10435843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A systematic review of structured versus non-structured breastfeeding programmes to support the initiation and duration of exclusive breastfeeding in acute and primary healthcare settings.
    Beake S; Pellowe C; Dykes F; Schmied V; Bick D
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2011; 9(36):1471-1508. PubMed ID: 27820165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Conditions and barriers for quality improvement work: a qualitative study of how professionals and health centre managers experience audit and feedback practices in Swedish primary care.
    Arvidsson E; Dahlin S; Anell A
    BMC Fam Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(1):113. PubMed ID: 34126935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
    Jamtvedt G; Young JM; Kristoffersen DT; Thomson O'Brien MA; Oxman AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (3):CD000259. PubMed ID: 12917891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy.
    Catlow J; Bhardwaj-Gosling R; Sharp L; Rutter MD; Sniehotta FF
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2022 Oct; 31(10):704-715. PubMed ID: 34893545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence-based clinical guidelines in Kyrgyz Republic.
    Zurdinova AA
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S45-6. PubMed ID: 26639705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implementing participation-focused services: A study to develop the Method for using Audit and Feedback in Participation Implementation (MAPi).
    Kolehmainen N; Marshall J; Hislop J; Fayed N; Kay D; Ternent L; Pennington L
    Child Care Health Dev; 2020 Jan; 46(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 31797401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A qualitative study of the variable effects of audit and feedback in the ICU.
    Sinuff T; Muscedere J; Rozmovits L; Dale CM; Scales DC
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Jun; 24(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 25918432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.