These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35313992)
41. First-line managers' experience of the use of audit and feedback cycle in specialist mental health care: A qualitative case study. Pedersen MS; Landheim A; Møller M; Lien L Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2019 Dec; 33(6):103-109. PubMed ID: 31753214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures? Hageman MG; Ring DC; Gregory PJ; Rubash HE; Harmon L Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 May; 473(5):1590-7. PubMed ID: 25287521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Reinvigorating stagnant science: implementation laboratories and a meta-laboratory to efficiently advance the science of audit and feedback. Grimshaw JM; Ivers N; Linklater S; Foy R; Francis JJ; Gude WT; Hysong SJ; BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 May; 28(5):416-423. PubMed ID: 30852557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. National perinatal mortality audits and resultant initiatives in four countries. Helps Ä; Leitao S; Gutman A; Greene R; O'Donoghue K Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():111-119. PubMed ID: 34749039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Improving dementia care: insights from audit and feedback in interdisciplinary primary care sites. Arsenault-Lapierre G; Le Berre M; Rojas-Rozo L; McAiney C; Ingram J; Lee L; Vedel I BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Mar; 22(1):353. PubMed ID: 35300660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Measurement without management: qualitative evaluation of a voluntary audit & feedback intervention for primary care teams. Wagner DJ; Durbin J; Barnsley J; Ivers NM BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 19(1):419. PubMed ID: 31234916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Provision, uptake and cost of cardiac rehabilitation programmes: improving services to under-represented groups. Beswick AD; Rees K; Griebsch I; Taylor FC; Burke M; West RR; Victory J; Brown J; Taylor RS; Ebrahim S Health Technol Assess; 2004 Oct; 8(41):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-152. PubMed ID: 15461879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. How do hospitals respond to feedback about blood transfusion practice? A multiple case study investigation. Gould NJ; Lorencatto F; During C; Rowley M; Glidewell L; Walwyn R; Michie S; Foy R; Stanworth SJ; Grimshaw JM; Francis JJ PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206676. PubMed ID: 30383792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. How does audit and feedback influence intentions of health professionals to improve practice? A laboratory experiment and field study in cardiac rehabilitation. Gude WT; van Engen-Verheul MM; van der Veer SN; de Keizer NF; Peek N BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):279-287. PubMed ID: 27068999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Audit feedback on reading performance of screening mammograms: An international comparison. Hofvind S; Bennett RL; Brisson J; Lee W; Pelletier E; Flugelman A; Geller B J Med Screen; 2016 Sep; 23(3):150-9. PubMed ID: 26892191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Audit and feedback as a clinical practice guideline implementation strategy: a model for acute care nurse practitioners. Dulko D Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2007; 4(4):200-9. PubMed ID: 18076463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The Calgary Audit and Feedback Framework: a practical, evidence-informed approach for the design and implementation of socially constructed learning interventions using audit and group feedback. Cooke LJ; Duncan D; Rivera L; Dowling SK; Symonds C; Armson H Implement Sci; 2018 Oct; 13(1):136. PubMed ID: 30376848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. WITHDRAWN: Audit and feedback versus alternative strategies: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. O'Brien MA; Oxman AD; Davis DA; Haynes RB; Freemantle N; Harvey EL Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (1):CD000260. PubMed ID: 17636624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Interns' perceptions of performance feedback. Ibrahim J; MacPhail A; Chadwick L; Jeffcott S Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):417-29. PubMed ID: 24606625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A multi-method evaluation of the implementation of a cancer teamwork assessment and feedback improvement programme (MDT-FIT) across a large integrated cancer system. Taylor C; Harris J; Stenner K; Sevdalis N; Green SAJ Cancer Med; 2021 Feb; 10(4):1240-1252. PubMed ID: 33480191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical audit of diabetes management can improve the quality of care in a resource-limited primary care setting. Govender I; Ehrlich R; Van Vuuren U; De Vries E; Namane M; De Sa A; Murie K; Schlemmer A; Govender S; Isaacs A; Martell R Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Dec; 24(6):612-8. PubMed ID: 23118094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care. Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; Dongelmans DA; de Jonge E; Peek N; de Keizer NF Implement Sci; 2019 Sep; 14(1):90. PubMed ID: 31533841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]