BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35314086)

  • 1. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer.
    Argenta PA; Mattson J; Rivard CL; Luther E; Schefter A; Vogel RI
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 May; 165(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 35314086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of apparent early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus.
    Lim YH; Dagher C; Abu-Rustum NR; Mueller JJ; Sonoda Y; Zivanovic O; Broach V; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 179():152-157. PubMed ID: 37980770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.
    Nasioudis D; Frey MK; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo TA; Holcomb K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 32276935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
    Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
    Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
    Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer.
    Koskas M; Jozwiak M; Fournier M; Vergote I; Trum H; Lok C; Amant F
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 65():185-91. PubMed ID: 27505629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term outcome of minimally invasive staging surgery for clinical stage I endometrial cancer: A single institute experience in Taiwan.
    Lu TF; Lu CH; Sun L; Liu CK; Shih YH; Hwang SF; Hsu ST
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2024 Jan; 87(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 37792993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
    Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers.
    Nieto VL; Huang Y; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):463.e1-463.e12. PubMed ID: 30086293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective comparative study of robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and laparotomy for endometrial cancer in patients with a low risk of recurrence.
    Hayashi S; Yamanaka Z; Kojima J; Ono M; Sasaki T; Yamamoto A; Ono M; Futagami M; Nishi H
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Jan; 50(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 37848280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of disease recurrence between robotic versus laparotomy approach in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
    Song J; Le T; Hopkins L; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Lupe K; Gaudet M; E C; Samant R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 31871112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
    Wright JD; Burke WM; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Huang Y; Hu JC; Hillyer GC; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 34(10):1087-96. PubMed ID: 26834057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
    Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.