These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3531429)

  • 1. Reproducibility of the border outline of working impressions of the edentulous mandible obtained by the Slack-Herbst method.
    Krysinski Z; Prylinski M
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1986 Jun; 28(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 3531429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impression technique for RPDs. A comparison between two methods.
    Gunne J; Högström J; Nilson H
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 2264016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A build-up impression technique for the edentulous mandible using various viscosities of silicone impression material.
    Fitzgerald M
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2014; 60(3):122-5. PubMed ID: 25080637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mucodynamic impressions with a closed mouth for the edentulous maxilla and mandible].
    Zietowska D; Płonka B
    Protet Stomatol; 1982; 32(4):153-8. PubMed ID: 6763724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cross-over Randomised Controlled Trial of selective pressure impressions for lower complete dentures.
    Hyde TP; Craddock HL; Blance A; Brunton PA
    J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):853-8. PubMed ID: 20637826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of lingual sulcus depth obtained with three impression materials.
    Jooste CH; Bradshaw D; Jooste N
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1987 May; 42(5):241-4. PubMed ID: 3313817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles.
    Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A technique for impressing the severely resorbed mandibular edentulous ridge.
    Chandrasekharan NK; Kunnekel AT; Verma M; Gupta RK
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 22372876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impression materials for recording the denture bearing mucosa.
    Koran A
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jan; 24(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 6987107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impression making.
    McCord JF; Grant AA
    Br Dent J; 2000 May; 188(9):484-92. PubMed ID: 10859847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mixed impressions (alginate and zinc oxide eugenol) in posterior bilaterally edentulous patients].
    Braun AA; de Vargas HM; Weigert F; Mazzaquatro W
    Rev Gaucha Odontol; 1975; 23(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 802326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions.
    Komiyama O; Saeki H; Kawara M; Kobayashi K; Otake S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 15211300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Two-stage Impression Technique for Making Edentulous Impressions of Maxillary Displaceable Fibrous Tissues.
    Antonelli JR; Hack SL; Georgescu M; Lopez KL
    Todays FDA; 2016; 28(2):68-9, 71. PubMed ID: 27220181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An impression procedure for the severely atrophied mandible.
    DeFranco RL; Sallustio A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jun; 73(6):574-7. PubMed ID: 11791271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A conservative prosthodontic option for the treatment of edentulous patients with atrophic (flat) mandibular ridges.
    McCord JF; Tyson KW
    Br Dent J; 1997 Jun; 182(12):469-72. PubMed ID: 9231521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reproducibility of an edentulous mandibular impression in the lingual flange area.
    Jooste CH; Reyneke HS; Hamman CA
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1984 Jun; 39(6):389-2. PubMed ID: 6388035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apparent viscosity of materials used for making edentulous impressions.
    Koran A; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1977 Jul; 95(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 267656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Examination of the reproducibility of impressions of edentulous mandible performed by several dental prostheticians].
    Pryliński M; Krysiński Z; Marciniak R; Szczerba A
    Protet Stomatol; 1987; 37(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 3333957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
    Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertical distortion in distal extension ridges and palatal area of casts made by different techniques.
    Wang HY; Lu YC; Shiau YY; Tsou D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 8648579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.