These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3531429)

  • 21. Edentulous jaw impression techniques: An in vivo comparison of trueness.
    Chebib N; Kalberer N; Srinivasan M; Maniewicz S; Perneger T; Müller F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):623-630. PubMed ID: 30580982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impression materials for complete and partial denture prosthodontics.
    Christensen GJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1984 Apr; 28(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 6373404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mandibular edentulous anatomy and modified impression technique.
    Renner RP
    Quintessence Dent Technol; 1987; 11(3):167-79. PubMed ID: 3296013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of tissue conditioning materials for functional impressions.
    Razek MK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Oct; 42(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 290790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-step impression for atrophic mandibular ridge.
    Dhananjay SG; Ashwini YK; Gangadhar SA; Lagdive SB; Pai UY
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e1195-7. PubMed ID: 22288495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Complete denture impressioning technique.
    Kois JC; Fan PP
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Jul; 18(7):699-704, 706-8; quiz 710. PubMed ID: 9533331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selected prosthodontic adaptation process for the aged.
    Arnold PD; Klein RA; Klein J
    J N J Dent Assoc; 1975; 47(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 801016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Maxillary definitive impression of excessively movable tissue with a single material.
    Comut A; Andrawis M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):616-8. PubMed ID: 26139042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Problems of measurement technic of surface reproduction of impression materials].
    Krebs R; Marx H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jul; 27(7):610-5. PubMed ID: 4504808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Extension of zinc oxide-eugenol paste impressions.
    Owall B
    Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1971 Oct; 64(10):673-9. PubMed ID: 4950176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Morphological-functional status of the edentulous mandible and selection of the most effective method for functional impression-taking (preliminary report)].
    Paluszkiewicz M
    Protet Stomatol; 1982; 32(4):159-65. PubMed ID: 6763725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Microbiological findings on Vikopres paste after functional impressions of the upper jaw].
    Teodosijević M; Nanusević O; Joković B; Miljković Z; Draganjac M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 1996; 53(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 9229945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On Comparing Two Different Tray-Holding Techniques for Edentulous Maxillary Impressions.
    Rignon-Bret C; Mushegyan V; Naveau A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 26929958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simple and consistent denture impression: materials and technique.
    LaMond GG
    Dent Today; 2005 Jun; 24(6):102-3. PubMed ID: 16025952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An implant impression technique using a plaster splinting index combined with a silicone impression.
    Eid N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 15583565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A selective-pressure impression technique for the edentulous maxilla.
    Duncan JP; Raghavendra S; Taylor TD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 15343168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Defects in automixed addition silicone elastomers prepared by putty-wash impression technique.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Nov; 18(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 1762027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro study of the number of surface defects in monophase and two-phase addition silicone impressions.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9656175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An anatomical anomaly of the lingual border of the mandibular impression.
    Wright SM
    J Dent; 1985 Sep; 13(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 3900164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neutral zone approach for the rehabilitation of a severely atrophic mandibular ridge: Case report.
    Ladha K; Gill S; Gupta R; Verma M
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):e166-9. PubMed ID: 22623474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.