BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35314316)

  • 21. Distribution of refractive error in healthy infants.
    Kuo A; Sinatra RB; Donahue SP
    J AAPOS; 2003 Jun; 7(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 12825056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bony Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Novel Phenotype of Aplasia of Lacrimal and Major Salivary Glands.
    Feng ZX; Liu W; Li Z; Cui Y; Li L; Zhang C
    Ophthalmology; 2024 May; 131(5):589-594. PubMed ID: 38081329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prevalence and etiology of amblyopia in Southern India: results from screening of school children aged 5-15 years.
    Ganekal S; Jhanji V; Liang Y; Dorairaj S
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 20(4):228-31. PubMed ID: 23865603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High prevalence of amblyopia risk factors in preverbal children with nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Matta NS; Silbert DI
    J AAPOS; 2011 Aug; 15(4):350-2. PubMed ID: 21907117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Associations of anisometropia with unilateral amblyopia, interocular acuity difference, and stereoacuity in preschoolers.
    Ying GS; Huang J; Maguire MG; Quinn G; Kulp MT; Ciner E; Cyert L; Orel-Bixler D;
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Mar; 120(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 23174398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Associations between hyperopia and other vision and refractive error characteristics.
    Kulp MT; Ying GS; Huang J; Maguire M; Quinn G; Ciner EB; Cyert LA; Orel-Bixler DA; Moore BD;
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 91(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 24637486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.
    Barrett BT; Bradley A; Candy TR
    Prog Retin Eye Res; 2013 Sep; 36():120-58. PubMed ID: 23773832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Congenital ptosis: amblyogenic refractive errors, amblyopia, manifest strabismus and stereopsis related to the types of ptosis. Data on 77 patients and review of the literature].
    Gusek-Schneider GC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 May; 219(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 12094315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual defects in Nepalese children with Down syndrome.
    Paudel N; Leat SJ; Adhikari P; Woodhouse JM; Shrestha JB
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 20406257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Incidence of Lacrimal Drainage Disorders Across a Tertiary Eye Care Network: Customization of an Indigenously Developed Electronic Medical Record System-eyeSmart.
    Das AV; Rath S; Naik MN; Ali MJ
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019; 35(4):354-356. PubMed ID: 30407992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of Perinatal Clinical Characteristics, Perinatal Risk Factors, and Microbial Profile in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in a Tertiary Care Center: A Descriptive Study.
    Natarajan K; Kasturi N; Sistla S
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):366-373. PubMed ID: 35959546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Amblyopia among Refractive Errors in an Eastern European Population.
    Mocanu V; Horhat R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2018 Mar; 54(1):. PubMed ID: 30344237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A retrospective analysis of children with anisometropic amblyopia in Nepal.
    Sapkota K
    Strabismus; 2014 Jun; 22(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 24725213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Non-Cycloplegic and Cycloplegic Autorefraction with Retinomax: An Agreement Study in Preschoolers in Los Angeles, California.
    Margines JB; Yu F; Mehravaran S; Coleman AL
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 30(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 36168672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction and Refractive Amblyopia Risk Factors: Effect of Age at the Time of Probing.
    Kilic D; Aydin I; Sirem MR; Birgin H; Guven S
    Beyoglu Eye J; 2022; 7(1):30-34. PubMed ID: 35265799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Management of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction with Probing, Experience in a Mexican Eye Center.
    Zuazo F; Morales OO; Tovilla ML; Castañeda ÁN
    Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 11(22):189-196. PubMed ID: 32792696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Amblyopia prevalence and risk factors in Australian preschool children.
    Pai AS; Rose KA; Leone JF; Sharbini S; Burlutsky G; Varma R; Wong TY; Mitchell P
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Jan; 119(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 21963268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nasolacrimal duct office probing in children under the age of 12 months: Cure rate and cost evaluation.
    Le Garrec J; Abadie-Koebele C; Parienti JJ; Molgat Y; Degoumois A; Mouriaux F
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Feb; 39(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 26826746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prevalence of buried probe in complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and evaluation of its success rate post 'probing and irrigation': a single-centre retrospective study.
    Gupta N; Chawla N; Ganesh S; Das S; Dhawan N; Bansal S; Singla P
    Orbit; 2018 Dec; 37(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 29400586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spontaneous Resolution and Timing of Intervention in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
    Sathiamoorthi S; Frank RD; Mohney BG
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 136(11):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 30178001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.