120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35314587)
1. Risk Factors for Positive Margins in High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia After Transformation Zone Excision.
Aguiar TD; Valente RP; Figueiredo AR; Beires JM; Vieira-Baptista P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Jul; 26(3):207-211. PubMed ID: 35314587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
Durmuş Y; Karalök A; Başaran D; Kamani MO; Boran N; Koç S; Turan AT
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Chen LM; Liu L; Tao X; He Y; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):534-540. PubMed ID: 31461810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kwok ST; Chan KKL; Tse KY; Chu MMY; Lau LSK; Ngan HYS; Ngu SF
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 36720549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.
Chen L; Liu L; Tao X; Guo L; Zhang H; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):24-27. PubMed ID: 30371553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of Positive Margins at Time of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.
Liss J; Alston M; Krull MB; Mazzoni SE
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Jan; 21(1):64-66. PubMed ID: 27906805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization].
Xiao YP; Tao X; Zhao CY; Qu YQ; Xie F; Ning Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of the endocervical margin status in LEEP: analysis of 610 cases.
Mirandez CC; Yoneda JY; Gertrudes LN; Carvalho CF; Derchain S; Teixeira JC; Vale DB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 306(3):851-856. PubMed ID: 35220477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Motomatsu S; Konno R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?
Numnum TM; Kirby TO; Leath CA; Huh WK; Alvarez RD; Straughn JM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 15870514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease.
Tyler LN; Andrews N; Parrish RS; Hazlett LJ; Korourian S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Apr; 131(4):622-4. PubMed ID: 17425396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction model for residual high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Yildirim Karaca S; Adiyeke M; Ince O; Ileri A; Vural T; Şahingöz Yildirim AG; Şenkaya AR; Bulut S; Kantarci S; Sanci M
Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 75(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 35107237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term predictors of residual or recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 after treatment with a large loop excision of the transformation zone: a retrospective study.
Fernández-Montolí ME; Tous S; Medina G; Castellarnau M; García-Tejedor A; de Sanjosé S
BJOG; 2020 Feb; 127(3):377-387. PubMed ID: 31631477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 'See and treat' regime by LEEP conisation is a safe and time saving procedure among women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kjellberg L; Tavelin B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(9):1140-4. PubMed ID: 17712659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Baloglu A; Uysal D; Bezircioglu I; Bicer M; Inci A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 282(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 19940997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
