These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3531468)

  • 1. Comparison study of elastic impression material.
    Drummond JL; Randolph RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Aug; 56(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 3531468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of impression-die systems on crown margins.
    Plekavich EJ; Joncas JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Jun; 49(6):772-6. PubMed ID: 6348258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of cervical discrepancy of gold crowns in stone dies from various impression materials].
    Mantovani AV; Stephano CB; Roselino RF; Roselino RB; Campos GM
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 2135328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of silver-plated and stone dies from rubber-base impressions.
    Cooney JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Sep; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 4612140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique.
    Ratnaweera PM; Yoshida K; Miura H; Kohta A; Tsuchihira K
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Sep; 50(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15074361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models.
    Johnson GH; Craig RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Apr; 53(4):484-90. PubMed ID: 3889281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Studies on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. Part 2. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of casts made by both single polyether rubber impression and the combined reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression technique (author's transl)].
    Shigeto N; Inohara N; Yamada S
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1978; 10(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 396327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal gap of crowns made with a phosphate-bonded investment and accelerated casting method.
    Schilling ER; Miller BH; Woody RD; Miller AW; Nunn ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 9922424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of plasma treatment on the wettability of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP; Nilner K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 8371180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technique for accurate rubber base impressions for fixed prosthodontics.
    Jamshidi M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Mar; 47(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 7038102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.