These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35315534)

  • 1. Is conformation relevant for QSAR purposes? 2D Chemical representation in a 3D-QSAR perspective.
    Daré JK; Freitas MP
    J Comput Chem; 2022 May; 43(13):917-922. PubMed ID: 35315534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple Conformer Descriptors for QSAR Modeling.
    Nikonenko A; Zankov D; Baskin I; Madzhidov T; Polishchuk P
    Mol Inform; 2021 Nov; 40(11):e2060030. PubMed ID: 34342944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing predictive ability of QSAR/QSPR models using 2D and 3D molecular representations.
    Sato A; Miyao T; Jasial S; Funatsu K
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Feb; 35(2):179-193. PubMed ID: 33392949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D perspective into MIA-QSAR: A case for anti-HCV agents.
    Daré JK; Ramalho TC; Freitas MP
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2019 Jun; 93(6):1096-1104. PubMed ID: 30411494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ligand-based prediction of active conformation by 3D-QSAR flexibility descriptors and their application in 3+3D-QSAR models.
    Martinek TA; Otvös F; Dervarics M; Tóth G; Fülöp F
    J Med Chem; 2005 May; 48(9):3239-50. PubMed ID: 15857130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. QSAR Modeling Based on Conformation Ensembles Using a Multi-Instance Learning Approach.
    Zankov DV; Matveieva M; Nikonenko AV; Nugmanov RI; Baskin II; Varnek A; Polishchuk P; Madzhidov TI
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Oct; 61(10):4913-4923. PubMed ID: 34554736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between 2D and 3D descriptors in QSAR modeling based on bio-active conformations.
    Bahia MS; Kaspi O; Touitou M; Binayev I; Dhail S; Spiegel J; Khazanov N; Yosipof A; Senderowitz H
    Mol Inform; 2023 Apr; 42(4):e2200186. PubMed ID: 36617991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conformational fingerprints in the modelling performance of MIA-QSAR: a case for SARS-CoV protease inhibitors.
    Daré JK; Silva DR; Ramalho TC; Freitas MP
    Mol Simul; 2020 Aug; 46(14):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 34191894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D-MoRSE descriptors explained.
    Devinyak O; Havrylyuk D; Lesyk R
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Nov; 54():194-203. PubMed ID: 25459771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review on principles, theory and practices of 2D-QSAR.
    Roy K; Das RN
    Curr Drug Metab; 2014; 15(4):346-79. PubMed ID: 25204823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. QSAR modeling using chirality descriptors derived from molecular topology.
    Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 12546547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D-QSAR and docking studies on 4-anilinoquinazoline and 4-anilinoquinoline epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
    Assefa H; Kamath S; Buolamwini JK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2003 Aug; 17(8):475-93. PubMed ID: 14703120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of molecular structures, endpoints' values, and predictivity parameters in QSAR research: QSAR analysis of a series of estrogen receptor binders.
    Li J; Gramatica P
    Mol Divers; 2010 Nov; 14(4):687-96. PubMed ID: 19921452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of Topological, Electronic, Geometrical, Constitutional and Quantum Chemical Based Descriptors in QSAR: mPGES-1 as a Case Study.
    Gupta A; Kumar V; Aparoy P
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2018; 18(13):1075-1090. PubMed ID: 30027847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ensemble QSAR: a QSAR method based on conformational ensembles and metric descriptors.
    Pissurlenkar RR; Khedkar VM; Iyer RP; Coutinho EC
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2204-18. PubMed ID: 21509786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating Multiple Receptor Conformation Docking and Multi Dimensional QSAR for Enhancing Accuracy of Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Radhika V; Jaraf HA; Kanth SS; Vijjulatha M
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2017; 13(2):127-142. PubMed ID: 28103770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benchmarking 2D/3D/MD-QSAR Models for Imatinib Derivatives: How Far Can We Predict?
    Kyaw Zin PP; Borrel A; Fourches D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jul; 60(7):3342-3360. PubMed ID: 32623886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A QSAR Study for Antileishmanial 2-Phenyl-2,3-dihydrobenzofurans
    Bernal FA; Schmidt TJ
    Molecules; 2023 Apr; 28(8):. PubMed ID: 37110632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alignment-independent technique for 3D QSAR analysis.
    Wilkes JG; Stoyanova-Slavova IB; Buzatu DA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Apr; 30(4):331-45. PubMed ID: 27026022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 4D-QSAR Models Applied to the Study of TGF- β1 Receptor Inhibitors.
    Maria de Assis T; Ramalho TC; Ferreira da Cunha EF
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2021; 21(13):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 34315368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.