143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35315835)
1. How does ankle power on the prosthetic side influence loading parameters on the sound side during level walking of persons with transfemoral amputation?
Pröbsting E; Altenburg B; Bellmann M; Krug K; Schmalz T
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Aug; 46(4):306-313. PubMed ID: 35315835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet.
Czerniecki JM; Gitter A; Munro C
J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 2026634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the unaffected leg during level-ground walking.
Grabowski AM; D'Andrea S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jun; 10():49. PubMed ID: 23758860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gait Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees on Level Ground in a Cohort of 53 Amputees - Comparison of Kinetics and Kinematics With Non-amputees.
Pröbsting E; Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Hahn A
Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2019; 2(2):32955. PubMed ID: 37614767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.
Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T; Kannenberg A; Bellmann M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 35090505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-distance walking effects on trans-tibial amputees compensatory gait patterns and implications on prosthetic designs and training.
Yeung LF; Leung AK; Zhang M; Lee WC
Gait Posture; 2012 Feb; 35(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 22055554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below knee amputees. A comparison of the SACH and Seattle feet.
Colborne GR; Naumann S; Longmuir PE; Berbrayer D
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Oct; 71(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 1388973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical risk factors for knee osteoarthritis when using passive and powered ankle-foot prostheses.
Russell Esposito E; Wilken JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Dec; 29(10):1186-92. PubMed ID: 25440576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra-individual biomechanical effects of a non-microprocessor-controlled stance-yielding prosthetic knee during ramp descent in persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation.
Okita Y; Yamasaki N; Nakamura T; Mita T; Kubo T; Mitsumoto A; Akune T
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 30051754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of push-off and collision work during step-to-step transition in amputees walking at self-selected speed: Effect of amputation level.
Sedran L; Bonnet X; Thomas-Pohl M; Loiret I; Martinet N; Pillet H; Paysant J
J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111943. PubMed ID: 38244403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation.
Houdijk H; Wezenberg D; Hak L; Cutti AG
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):76. PubMed ID: 30255807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prosthetic push-off power in trans-tibial amputee level ground walking: A systematic review.
Müller R; Tronicke L; Abel R; Lechler K
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225032. PubMed ID: 31743353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Altering the tuning parameter settings of a commercial powered prosthetic foot to increase power during push-off may not reduce collisional work in the intact limb during gait.
Davidson AM; Childers WL; Chang YH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Oct; 45(5):410-416. PubMed ID: 34469940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transtibial amputee gait efficiency: Energy storage and return versus solid ankle cushioned heel prosthetic feet.
Gardiner J; Bari AZ; Howard D; Kenney L
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(6):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 28355033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the contralateral limb: a case series.
Hill D; Herr H
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650375. PubMed ID: 24187194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel pivot ankle/foot prosthesis reduces sound side loading and risk for osteoarthritis: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
Runciman P; Cockcroft J; Derman W
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Jun; 46(3):258-266. PubMed ID: 35019886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Energy costs and performance of transfemoral amputees and non-amputees during walking and running: A pilot study.
Mengelkoch LJ; Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):484-491. PubMed ID: 27885098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the International Committee of the Red Cross foot with the solid ankle cushion heel foot during gait: a randomized double-blind study.
Turcot K; Sagawa Y; Lacraz A; Lenoir J; Assal M; Armand S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1490-7. PubMed ID: 23578592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
