These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35315875)

  • 21. Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):16. PubMed ID: 23397041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Binocular coordination in response to two-dimensional, three-dimensional and stereoscopic visual stimuli.
    Blythe HI; Holliman NS; Jainta S; Tbaily LW; Liversedge SP
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):397-411. PubMed ID: 22775140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computation of Object Size in Visual Cortical Area V4 as a Neural Basis for Size Constancy.
    Tanaka S; Fujita I
    J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(34):12033-46. PubMed ID: 26311782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vergence provides veridical depth perception from horizontal retinal image disparities.
    Mon-Williams M; Tresilian JR; Roberts A
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Aug; 133(3):407-13. PubMed ID: 10958531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Disparity-defined objects moving in depth do not elicit three-dimensional shape constancy.
    Scarfe P; Hibbard PB
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1599-610. PubMed ID: 16364392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The precision of binocular and monocular depth judgments in natural settings.
    McKee SP; Taylor DG
    J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):5. PubMed ID: 20884470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Judgments of the distance to nearby virtual objects: interaction of viewing conditions and accommodative demand.
    Ellis SR; Menges BM
    Presence (Camb); 1997 Aug; 6(4):452-60. PubMed ID: 11540610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy.
    Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC
    Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contributions of Stereopsis and Aviation Experience to Simulated Rotary Wing Altitude Estimation.
    Hartle B; Sudhama A; Deas LM; Allison RS; Irving EL; Glaholt MG; Wilcox LM
    Hum Factors; 2020 Aug; 62(5):812-824. PubMed ID: 31211928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The right view from the wrong location: depth perception in stereoscopic multi-user virtual environments.
    Pollock B; Burton M; Kelly JW; Gilbert S; Winer E
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):581-8. PubMed ID: 22402685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Viewing distance affects stereoscopic tilt created with spatial frequency disparity.
    Patterson R; Burns G; Mooney S
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Aug; 66(8):554-7. PubMed ID: 2771347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The familiar-size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception.
    Predebon J
    Perception; 1993; 22(8):985-95. PubMed ID: 8190600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Familiar size affects perception differently in virtual reality and the real world.
    Rzepka AM; Hussey KJ; Maltz MV; Babin K; Wilcox LM; Culham JC
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1869):20210464. PubMed ID: 36511414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: a new interpretation.
    Bishop PO
    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1989 Sep; 237(1289):445-69. PubMed ID: 2573901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perception of artificial stereoscopic stimuli from an incorrect viewing point.
    Bereby-Meyer Y; Leiser D; Meyer J
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1555-63. PubMed ID: 10598469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stereoscopic viewing and reported perceived immersion and symptoms.
    Yang SN; Schlieski T; Selmins B; Cooper SC; Doherty RA; Corriveau PJ; Sheedy JE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):1068-80. PubMed ID: 22733100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Seeing in 3-d with just one eye: stereopsis without binocular vision.
    Vishwanath D; Hibbard PB
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1673-85. PubMed ID: 23892232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Binocular Information Improves the Reliability and Consistency of Pictorial Relief.
    Hibbard PB; Hornsey RL; Asher JM
    Vision (Basel); 2022 Dec; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 36649048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Localization of virtual objects in the near visual field.
    Ellis SR; Menges BM
    Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):415-31. PubMed ID: 11536894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of pictorial depth cues, binocular disparity cues and motion parallax depth cues on lightness perception in three-dimensional virtual scenes.
    Kitazaki M; Kobiki H; Maloney LT
    PLoS One; 2008 Sep; 3(9):e3177. PubMed ID: 18781201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.