These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3531626)

  • 1. [Progress in prosthetic heart valves].
    Komatsu S; Inoue N
    Nihon Rinsho; 1986 Jul; 44(7):1698-707. PubMed ID: 3531626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FDA's requirements for in-vivo performance data for prosthetic heart valves.
    Johnson DM; Sapirstein W
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jul; 3(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 7952304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of prosthetic cardiac devices: a guide for the practising pathologist.
    Butany J; Collins MJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 58(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 15677529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are bioprostheses superior to mechanical valves?
    Schön HR; Unger B; Weingartner F; Sebening H; Blömer H
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():286-8. PubMed ID: 3727703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Carotid pulse curve in patients with prosthetic aortic heart valves (author's transl)].
    Schwab W; Raas E
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1980 Jul; 130(13-14):475-8. PubMed ID: 7424036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
    Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
    Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of design on bioprosthetic valve durability.
    Vesely I
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 11921660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The first step to understanding valve failure: an overview of pathology.
    Schoen FJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S50-3. PubMed ID: 1389279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioprostheses are superior to mechanical prostheses.
    Jamieson WR
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():258-71. PubMed ID: 3727698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The "ideal" replacement heart valve.
    Sapirstein JS; Smith PK
    Am Heart J; 2001 May; 141(5):856-60. PubMed ID: 11320378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shop order fracture rate as a risk factor for strut fracture in Björk-Shiley CC60 degrees heart valves.
    Walker AM; Funch DP; Bianchi L; Blot WJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 May; 6(3):264-7; discussion 268. PubMed ID: 9183725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Christie GW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S95-100; discussion S101. PubMed ID: 1389288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR
    Can J Surg; 1985 Nov; 28(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 4063890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term management of prosthetic valves.
    DeSilvey DL
    Heart Dis Stroke; 1993; 2(6):493-6. PubMed ID: 8137056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comments on "Non-destructive evaluation of prosthetic heart valves by holographic interferometry".
    Bokros JC
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 May; 2(3):341-2. PubMed ID: 8269129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kangaroo xenobioprostheses--an advantage in heart valve replacement.
    Weinhold C; Weingartner J; Adt M; Peters D; Reichart B; Kreuzer E; Gokel JM; Hammer C
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():251-3. PubMed ID: 3727696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heart valve bioprosthesis durability: a challenge to the new generation of porcine valves.
    Valente M; Minarini M; Maizza AF; Bortolotti U; Thiene G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S82-90. PubMed ID: 1389286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and evaluation of a swine model to assess the preclinical safety of mechanical heart valves.
    Grehan JF; Hilbert SL; Ferrans VJ; Droel JS; Salerno CT; Bianco RW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Sep; 9(5):710-9; discussion 719-20. PubMed ID: 11041189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mitral stenosis].
    Krzemińska-Pakuła M; Zasłonka J
    Kardiol Pol; 1991; 34(5):296-300. PubMed ID: 1921113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.