These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3531626)

  • 21. Clinical evaluation and analysis of heart valve substitutes.
    Grunkemeier GL; Anderson WN
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 9587856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of pressure- and volume-loss of technical and biological heart valve prostheses.
    Köhler J
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():272-6. PubMed ID: 3727699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach.
    Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tubular heart valves.
    Cox JL; Quijano RC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 133(3):845-6. PubMed ID: 17320614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bioprosthetic valve failure.
    Schoen FJ; Kujovich JL; Levy RJ; Sutton MS
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1988; 18(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 3275416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Pre and postoperative hemodynamics after mitral valve replacement by Björk-Shiley (MBP) or swine-(HPX)-valves].
    Fricke G; Papachrysanthou C; Mattern H; Wisskirchen KJ
    Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1978; (84):772-6. PubMed ID: 742122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Considerations in the selection of cardiac prosthetic valves for children, tissue versus mechanical.
    Copeland JG; Mammana RB; Allen HD; Valdes-Cruz LM; Goldberg SJ
    Ariz Med; 1982 Apr; 39(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 7103760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative in vitro evaluation of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reul H; Giersiepen M; Schindehütte H; Effert S; Rau G
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():223-31. PubMed ID: 3727690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [In vitro evaluation of hydrodynamics of prosthetic heart valves].
    Okude J
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Nov; 89(11):1893-902. PubMed ID: 3205255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Hemodynamic evaluation of long-term follow-up prosthetic valves in mitral position using Doppler ultrasound and echocardiography--with special reference to types and sizes].
    Yanagi H
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Apr; 36(4):454-65. PubMed ID: 3047277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tissue engineered heart valves: will a clinical application be possible?
    Ozaki S
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 11(4):219-20. PubMed ID: 16148866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does pericardial thickness guarantee a homogeneous bioprosthetic product? Evaluation of modification in the physical characteristics of bovine pericardium exposed to pressure stress test.
    Mikus PM; Arpesella G; Gargiulo G; Cirillo M; Marrozzini C; Pierangeli V; Pierangeli A
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():237-40. PubMed ID: 3727692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Thrombocytopenia after aortic valve replacement: comparison between mechanical and biological valves.
    van Straten AH; Hamad MA; Berreklouw E; ter Woorst JF; Martens EJ; Tan ME
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 20583405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Evaluation of prosthetic valve function].
    Sakai K
    Kokyu To Junkan; 1992 Apr; 40(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 1570424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Selection of the prosthetic valve for mitral valve replacement].
    Yada I; Mizutani T; Miyamura K; Nasu M; Yuasa H; Kusagawa M; Shomura T; Hata H; Yoshizumi M; Fujii H
    Kyobu Geka; 1984 Sep; 37(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 6503073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cardiac valve replacement in children: comparison of tissue with mechanical prostheses.
    Sade RM; Ballenger JF; Hohn AR; Arrants JE; Riopel DA; Taylor AB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Jul; 78(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 571943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac valve prostheses.
    Kotler MN; Goldman A; Parry WR
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1986; 17(1):201-41. PubMed ID: 3768920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bioprosthetic heart valve failure: pathology and pathogenesis.
    Schoen FJ; Levy RJ
    Cardiol Clin; 1984 Nov; 2(4):717-39. PubMed ID: 6400011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.